CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 984Corporate Identity and ReputationCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingNonprofit Sector and Volunteering

Corporate Reputation and Philanthropy: An Empirical Analysis

Brammer, Stephen, Millington, Andrew·2005·Journal of Business Ethics
DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Firms may take advantage of strategic opportunities to bolster their image, particularly when they are perceived as socially irresponsible.

    “firms may take advantage of strategic opportunities to bolster their image, particularly when they are perceived as socially irresponsible (Brammer and Millington, 2005;Muller and Kra ¨ussl, 2011).”

    From Strategic Silence: Withholding Certification Status as a Hypocrisy Avoidance Tactic (2018) · cites this paper as Brammer and Millington, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brammer, S., & Millington, A.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Brammer, Stephen
ORCID
Brammer, Stephen
Venue
Journal of Business Ethics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2005-09
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
29-44
ISSN
  • 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0697
DOI
10.1007/s10551-005-7443-4
OpenAlex
W2005093284
Cited by
984
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 33
FWCI
36.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Keywords
corporate reputation, corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perspectives, stakeholder management, corporate social responsibility, industry differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review