Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 621

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies

Alvesson, Mats·2000·Journal of Management Studies

Abstract

This paper treats the significance of organization‐based social identity for loyalty versus exit reactions with special reference to knowledge‐intensive companies. The centrality of network relations and close contact with clients in combination with the sometimes drastic consequences of knowledge workers defecting in many knowledge‐intensive companies makes social identification and loyalty crucial themes for management. The paper discusses different kinds of and modes of accomplishing loyalty and also addresses post‐exit management, how companies may deal with employees that have left the company.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-6486.00218

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 621

Metadata

Authors
Alvesson, M.
Venue
Journal of Management Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1101-1124
ISSN
  • 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6486
OpenAlex
W2154542338
Cited by
621
References
0
FWCI
22.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-6486.00218
The paper
Alvesson, M. (2000). Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.