The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflexivity in Management Research*
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Recently the term reflexivity has entered management discourses about research, education and practice. This paper highlights the ambiguity which prevails concerning the concept of reflexivity showing how the ways in which reflexivity itself is constituted inevitably articulates epistemological circularity in that commentators’ definitions and prescriptions vary according to their tacit metatheoretical commitments. Hence the aim of this paper is to explore this paradox by excavating such commitments and demonstrating how they constitute particular forms of reflexivity – each with distinctive implications for the role of the management researcher in terms of aims, processes, and outcomes. Three generic forms of reflexivity are proposed: the methodological, the hyper or deconstructive, and the epistemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age
Melucci, A. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520891 · Cited by 1,976
Beck, U. (1996) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276496013004001 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Ideology in HRM Scholarship: Interrogating the Ideological Performativity of ‘New Unitarism’
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3084-z · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, P., & Duberley, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1279-1303
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2162489813
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflexivity in Management Research*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-6486.00380
- The paper
- Johnson, P., & Duberley, J. (2003). Reflexivity in Management Research*. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00380
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
