The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Longitudinal Study of Personality Change in Young Adulthood
Abstract
The present research examined personality continuity and change in a sample of young men and women assessed at the beginning and end of college. Two‐hundred seventy students completed measures of the Big Five personality traits when they first entered college and then four years later. Analyses indicate small‐ to medium‐sized normative (i.e., mean‐level) changes, large rank‐order stability correlations, high levels of stability in personality structure, and moderate levels of ipsative (i.e. profile) stability. Overall, the findings are consistent with the perspective that personality traits exhibits considerable continuity over time, yet can change in systematic ways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
Arnett, J. J. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.5.469 · Cited by 16,843
Personality change in women from college to midlife.
Helson, R., & Moane, G. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.176 · Cited by 239
Change in Dispositional Well-Being and Its Relation to Role Quality: A 30-Year Longitudinal Study
Roberts, B. W., & Chapman, C. N. (2000) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2259 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Cited by
Development and validation of the short grit scale (grit-s)
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802634290 · Cited by 3,376
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 · Cited by 3,318
Self-citationThe impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation
Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002 · Cited by 1,549
Universal Features of Personality Traits From the Observer's Perspective: Data From 50 Cultures.
McCrae, R. R., 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project, & Terracciano, A. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547 · Cited by 1,326
Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024950 · Cited by 1,318
Metadata
- Authors
- Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., Roberts, B. W., & Trzesniewski, K. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 617-640
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2024718301
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
