Cited by 142Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorCultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Nature and Culture: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective

Buss, David M.·2001·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Personality psychology is the broadest of all psychological subdisciplines in that it seeks a conceptually integrated understanding of both human nature and important individual differences. Cultural differences pose a unique set of problems for any comprehensive theory of personality-how can they be reconciled with universals of human nature on the one hand and within-cultural variation on the other? Evolutionary psychology provides one set of conceptual tools by which this conceptual integration can be made. It requires jettisoning the false but still-pervasive dichotomy of culture versus biology, acknowledging a universal human nature, and recognizing that the human mind contains many complex psychological mechanisms that are selectively activated, depending on cultural contexts. Culture rests on a foundation of evolved psychological mechanisms and cannot be understood without those mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-6494.696171

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biological and ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices.

    “What is more, these biological and ultimately ethological universals affect significantly the construction and execution of certain cultural practices, a phenomenon some refer to as”

    From Disgusting Bodies, Disgusting Religion: The Biology of Tantra (2011) · cites this paper as Buss 2001: 974

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Buss, D. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Buss, David M.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
955-978
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2145691995
Cited by
142
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
evolutionary psychology, human nature, culture, personality psychology, individual differences, evolved psychological mechanisms, cultural context
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Biological Evolution, Humans, Personality, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review