The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Tropical Forest Transition? Agricultural Change, Out-migration, and Secondary Forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon
Abstract
Could old colonization zones in the urbanizing and industrializing countries of Latin America become sites for a tropical forest transition in which reforestation becomes more prevalent than deforestation? We try to answer this question through a case study of land-use change and migration since 1985 in a long-settled region of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Data from remote sensing analyses, household surveys, and land-use maps of individual farms reveal two disparate patterns of reforestation in the region, one on peripheral lands far from roads and the other on lands close to roads. The former pattern characterizes most places experiencing a forest transition; the latter pattern does not. Roadside reforestation has occurred in part because Amerindian smallholders have abandoned cattle ranching in order to practice short-cycle shifting cultivation of crops for expanding urban and export markets. This example suggests that tropical forest transitions may differ from earlier temperate forest transitions in that reforestation does not signify land abandonment. Even as they come to rely more completely on nonfarm sources of income, smallholders in developing countries continue to manage their land, reforesting when it eliminates expenses or promises new, near-term streams of income.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model
Perfecto, I., & Vandermeer, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0905455107 · Cited by 732
Global Forest Transition: Prospects for an End to Deforestation
Meyfroidt, P., & Lambin, E. F. (2011) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 · Cited by 659
Middle-range theories of land system change
Meyfroidt, P., Roy Chowdhury, R., de Bremond, A., Ellis, E. C., Erb, K.-H., Filatova, T., Garrett, R. D., Grove, J. M., Heinimann, A., Kuemmerle, T., et al. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006 · Cited by 604
Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya
Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013 · Cited by 462
Four Centuries of Change in Northeastern United States Forests
Thompson, J. R., Carpenter, D. N., Cogbill, C. V., & Foster, D. R. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072540 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R.
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-102
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W1977579711
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Tropical Forest Transition? Agricultural Change, Out-migration, and Secondary Forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8306.00281
- The paper
- Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R. (2002). A Tropical Forest Transition? Agricultural Change, Out-migration, and Secondary Forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.