The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Governing the commons — the evolution of institutions for collective action
Weede, E. (1992) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(92)90034-e · Cited by 3,919
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources
Agrawal, A. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00063-8 · Cited by 2,025
Self-citationRethinking Community‐Based Conservation
BERKES, F. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x · Cited by 1,884
Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities?Preprint
Baland, J., & Platteau, J. (2000) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,191
More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya
Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M. J., & Gichuki, F. N. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,112
Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India
(1988) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(88)90101-5 · Cited by 1,038
Rethinking the Causes of Deforestation: Lessons from Economic Models
Angelsen, A., & Kaimowitz, D. (1999) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/14.1.73 · Cited by 1,012
Cited by
A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management
Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03704-150438 · Cited by 1,328
Conditional Cooperation and Costly Monitoring Explain Success in Forest Commons Management
Rustagi, D., Engel, S., & Kosfeld, M. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1193649 · Cited by 575
Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods
Fischer, H. W., Chhatre, A., Duddu, A., Pradhan, N., & Agrawal, A. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01863-6 · Cited by 105
Self-citationRana, P., & Miller, D. C. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aafa8f · Cited by 41
The cultural evolution of collective property rights for sustainable resource governance
Andrews, J., Clark, M., Hillis, V., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2024) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-024-01290-1 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-166
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038981225
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 8.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
- The paper
- Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
