Mapping Process to Pattern in the Landscape Change of the Amazonian Frontier
Abstract
Changes in land use and land cover are dynamic processes reflecting a sequence of decisions made by individual land managers. In developing economies, these decisions may be embedded in the evolution of individual households, as is often the case in indigenous areas and agricultural frontiers. One goal of the present article is to address the land-use and land-cover decisions of colonist farmers in the Amazon Basin as a function, in part, of household characteristics. Another goal is to generalize the issue of tropical deforestation into a broader discussion on forest dynamics. The extent of secondary forest in tropical areas has been well documented in South America and Africa. Agricultural-plot abandonment often occurs in tandem with primary forest clearance and as part of the same decision-making calculus. Consequently, tropical deforestation and forest succession are not independent processes in the landscape. This article presents a framework that integrates them into a model of forest dynamics at household level, and in so doing provides an account of the spatial pattern of deforestation that has been observed in the Amazon's colonization frontiers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent ethnographic studies across the basin suggest that smallholders are shifting from subsistence agriculture to a pasture-based farming system.
“Such findings mirror recent ethnographic studies across the basin, suggesting that smallholders are shifting from subsistence agriculture to a pasture-based farming system [10,25,26].”
From Smallholders, Agrarian Reform, and Globalization in the Brazilian Amazon: Cattle versus the Environment (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001 · Cited by 4,788 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The ‘‘new economic geography’’ calls for the use of ‘‘computer-assisted thinking’’ and numerical techniques as supplements to analytical results (Fujita, Krugman, and Venables 1999, 8).”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Broadbent, E. N., Asner, G. P., Keller, M., Knapp, D. E., Oliveira, P. J. C., & Silva, J. N. (2008) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.04.024 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Pereira, R., Simmons, C., & Walker, R. (2016) · Land · doi:10.3390/land5030024 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Walker, R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walker, Robert
- ORCID
- Walker, Robert
- Venue
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 376-398
- ISSN
- 0004-5608 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8306
- OpenAlex
- W2000249539
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the Association of American Geographers (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Keywords
- land use and land cover change, tropical deforestation, forest dynamics, forest succession, secondary forest, agricultural abandonment, household decision-making, Indigenous land management, agricultural frontier, Amazon frontier, household characteristics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review