Cited by 15Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsAnthropology: Ethics, History, CultureSpanish Culture and Identity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid response ethnographies in turbulent times: Researching mass grave exhumations in contemporary Spain (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate)

Open access
Ferrándiz, Francisco·2013·Anthropology Today

Abstract

Sometimes a social process under engaged research can swiftly grow out of control, in scale and complexity. Such was the case in my ten-year-long study of mass grave exhumations from the Civil War (1936–1939) in contemporary Spain. In such circumstances, I argue for the deployment of a rapid response ethnography, an extreme modality of both public and/or engaged research. This type of instant engagement forces the ethnographer to constantly refashion research designs; recognize and reabsorb emerging social actors and research scenarios; reinvent ethnographic presence; face unanticipated ethical dilemmas; and reimagine how to transfer our acquired knowledge and reflection in (a) multiple non-academic formats for a myriad of potential publics and (b), in time frames more attuned to the rhythms of fast-moving public debates and technological transformations in communications. More importantly, rapid response ethnography takes place whenever there is swift and strong public demand for academic analysis within a broader process of social, political and media controversy. In turn, rapid response research is necessarily committed to the transformation of the social and political conditions under study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8322.12073

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferrándiz, F.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Ferrándiz, Francisco
Venue
Anthropology Today
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
18-22
ISSN
  • 0268-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8322
OpenAlex
W3007712413
Cited by
13
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anthropology Today (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Spanish Culture and Identity
Keywords
mass grave exhumation, Spanish Civil War, engaged research, public research, research ethics, knowledge transfer, social memory, political conflict, media controversy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review