The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study
Open accessAbstract
Usually, students learn more if the method of instruction matches their learning style. Since Physics and Chemistry deal with three–dimensional (3–D) objects, the ability to visualize and mentally manipulate shapes is very helpful in their learning. In fact, much of what Physics and Chemistry students know takes the form of images. However, little attention has been given to the pedagogical effectiveness of visual stimuli in those disciplines. Computers are being increasingly used as teaching tools. The new approaches include simulations, multimedia presentations and, more recently, virtual environments. Computer–based worlds are useful to visualize physical and chemical processes allowing for better conceptual understanding. Since 3–D virtual environments need to be explored and evaluated in science education, we have created a virtual environment ( Virtual Water ) for studying phases of matter, phase transitions and atomic orbitals at the final year of high school and first year of university levels. Based on that work, we discuss the implications of visual learning in designing strategies to cater for differences in learning modes. Our study indicates that 3–D virtual environments may help students with high spatial aptitude to acquire better conceptual understandings. However, only some parameters (interactivity, navigation and 3–D perception) have shown to be relevant and only for some topics. On the other hand, stereoscopic visualizations do not seem to be relevant, with the exception of crystalline structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Virtual reality: Applications and implications for tourism
Guttentag, D. A. (2010) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003 · Cited by 1,747
Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009)
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020 · Cited by 1,122
The learning effects of computer simulations in science education
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017 · Cited by 985
Tüzün, H., Yılmaz-Soylu, M., Karakuş, T., İnal, Y., & Kızılkaya, G. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.008 · Cited by 587
(2007) · Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London) · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471-488
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2134501117
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8535.00283
- The paper
- Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.