The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009)
Abstract
This study is a ten-year critical review of empirical research on the educational applications of Virtual Reality (VR). Results show that although the majority of the 53 reviewed articles refer to science and mathematics, researchers from social sciences also seem to appreciate the educational value of VR and incorporate their learning goals in Educational Virtual Environments (EVEs). Although VR supports multisensory interaction channels, visual representations predominate. Few are the studies that incorporate intuitive interactivity, indicating a research trend in this direction. Few are the settings that use immersive EVEs reporting positive results on users' attitudes and learning outcomes, indicating that there is a need for further research on the capabilities of such systems. Features of VR that contribute to learning such as first order experiences, natural semantics, size, transduction, reification, autonomy and presence are exploited according to the educational context and content. Presence seems to play an important role in learning and it is a subject needing further and intensive studies. Constructivism seems to be the theoretical model the majority of the EVEs are based on. The studies present real world, authentic tasks that enable context and content dependent knowledge construction. They also provide multiple representations of reality by representing the natural complexity of the world. Findings show that collaboration and social negotiation are not only limited to the participants of an EVE, but exist between participants and avatars, offering a new dimension to computer assisted learning. Little can yet be concluded regarding the retention of the knowledge acquired in EVEs. Longitudinal studies are necessary, and we believe that the main outcome of this study is the future research perspectives it brings to light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence
Steuer, J. (1992) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x · Cited by 5,459
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410609519 · Cited by 2,732
What are the learning affordances of 3‐D virtual environments?
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x · Cited by 1,840
Handbook of research on educational communications and technology
(2004) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00409_15.x · Cited by 1,840
Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning
Dede, C. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167311 · Cited by 1,707
Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203461976 · Cited by 1,214
Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World
Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (1996) · Cited by 991
Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking
Jonassen, D. H. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 825
Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model
Jonassen, D. H. (1994) · Educational Technology archive · Cited by 798
Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400701793141 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133
Enhancing Our Lives with Immersive Virtual Reality
Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2016.00074 · Cited by 1,993
A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0 · Cited by 1,638
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2 · Cited by 1,438
Makransky, G., Borre‐Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12375 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A.
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 769-780
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070252312
- Cited by
- 1,122
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 46.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
- The paper
- Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.