CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 503Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Welfare and AdoptionPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attachment for Infants in Foster Care: The Role of Caregiver State of Mind

Dozier, Mary, Stoval, K Chase, Albus, Kathleen E, Bates, Brady·2001·Child Development
DOI 10.1111/1467-8624.00360
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The concordance between foster mothers' attachment state of mind and foster infants' attachment quality was examined for 50 foster mother – infant dyads. Babies had been placed into the care of their foster mothers between birth and 20 months of age. Attachment quality was assessed between 12 and 24 months of age, at least 3 months after the infants' placement into foster care. The two-way correspondence between maternal state of mind and infant attachment quality was 72%, κ= .43, similar to the level seen among biologically intact mother – infant dyads. Contrary to expectations, age at placement was not related to attachment quality. Rather, concordance between maternal state of mind and infant attachment was seen for relatively late-placed babies, as well as early placed babies. These findings have two major implications. First, following a disruption in care during the first year and a half of life, babies appear capable of organizing their behavior around the availability of new caregivers. Second, these data argue for a nongenetic mechanism for the intergenerational transmission of attachment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00360

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 502

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dozier, M., Stoval, K. C., Albus, K. E., & Bates, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • Cornell University Medical Center , Ithaca, NY
ORCID
Dozier, Mary
Venue
Child Development
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2001-09-01
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
1467-1477
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
DOI
10.1111/1467-8624.00360
OpenAlex
W2168891008
Cited by
503
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Social Services, Australian Government
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (52135)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
infant attachment, foster care, foster mothers, attachment quality, intergenerational transmission of attachment, age at placement, caregiver availability, mother-infant dyads
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Mother-Child Relations, Object Attachment, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Intergenerational Relations, Caregivers, Infant Behavior, Reactive Attachment Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review