Cited by 324Child Welfare and AdoptionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsEarly Childhood Education and Development

Placement in foster care enhances quality of attachment among young institutionalized children

Open access
Smyke, Anna T, Zeanah, Charles H, Fox, Nathan A, Nelson, Charles A, Guthrie, Donald·2010·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined classifications of attachment in 42-month-old Romanian children (N = 169). Institutionalized since birth, children were assessed comprehensively, randomly assigned to care as usual (CAU) or to foster care, and compared to family-reared children. Attachment classifications for children in foster care were markedly different from those in the CAU. Importantly, children placed in foster care before 24 months were more likely to have secure attachments and if placed earlier were less likely to have disorganized or insecure-other attachments. Cognitive status predicted greater likelihood of organized attachment in the CAU and greater likelihood of secure attachment in the foster care and never-institutionalized groups. Foster care is an important intervention to reduce the adverse effects following early deprivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01390.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cassidy J Marvin RS MacArthur Working Group Attachment organization in preschool children: Procedures and manual (4th ed.) 1992 University of Virginia with the Unpublished manuscript
  2. Heinicke CM Fineman NR Ruth G Relationship-based intervention with at-risk mothers: Outcome in the first year of life Infant Mental Health Journal 1999 20 349 374

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smyke, A. T., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., Nelson, C. A., & Guthrie, D.
Affiliations
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Smyke, Anna T
Venue
Child Development
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
212-223
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2025348075
Cited by
324
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
59.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
foster care, attachment quality, institutionalized children, Romanian orphans, early deprivation, attachment classification, disorganized attachment, secure attachment, cognitive status
MeSH terms
Child Rearing, Child, Institutionalized, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Family, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Object Attachment, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review