The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect
Abstract
Visual search is a common task both in naturalistic settings and in the laboratory. Outside the labora tory, one might look for a car in a parking lot, a name in text, or a nav igation marker on the horizon. In the laboratory, search is simplified in several ways; commonly, the sub ject views a set of distinct objects and is asked to detect the presence of a particular object (the target) among a set of distractors. Two ex amples are shown in Figure 1. The top two panels illustrate the contrast increment task, in which the target is a disk of high luminance and the dis tractors are disks of lower lumi nance; the bottom two panels illus trate the line bisection task, in which the target is a rotated L and the dis tractors are rotated Ts. One of the most studied aspects of visual search is the effect on per formance of the number of objects, here referred to as the display set size. Display set sizes of 2 and 24 are illustrated in Figure 1. In the top panels, the target pops out?even for a large display set size. More pre cisely, display set size has little or no effect on search time or accuracy when the target is much brighter than the distractors. In contrast, in the bottom panels, finding the target requires scrutiny for the large set size. Display set size has a large ef feet on both search time and accu
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Normalization as a canonical neural computation
Carandini, M., & Heeger, D. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3136 · Cited by 1,906
A detection theory account of change detection
Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.12.11 · Cited by 771
Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483 · Cited by 490
Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems
Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Scholl, B. J. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(97)01113-3 · Cited by 466
The brain circuitry of attention
Shipp, S. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.004 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, J.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 118-123
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2083202483
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772534
- The paper
- Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.