The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A detection theory account of change detection
Open accessAbstract
Previous studies have suggested that visual short-term memory (VSTM) has a storage limit of approximately four items. However, the type of high-threshold (HT) model used to derive this estimate is based on a number of assumptions that have been criticized in other experimental paradigms (e.g., visual search). Here we report findings from nine experiments in which VSTM for color, spatial frequency, and orientation was modeled using a signal detection theory (SDT) approach. In Experiments 1-6, two arrays composed of multiple stimulus elements were presented for 100 ms with a 1500 ms ISI. Observers were asked to report in a yes/no fashion whether there was any difference between the first and second arrays, and to rate their confidence in their response on a 1-4 scale. In Experiments 1-3, only one stimulus element difference could occur (T = 1) while set size was varied. In Experiments 4-6, set size was fixed while the number of stimuli that might change was varied (T = 1, 2, 3, and 4). Three general models were tested against the receiver operating characteristics generated by the six experiments. In addition to the HT model, two SDT models were tried: one assuming summation of signals prior to a decision, the other using a max rule. In Experiments 7-9, observers were asked to directly report the relevant feature attribute of a stimulus presented 1500 ms previously, from an array of varying set size. Overall, the results suggest that observers encode stimuli independently and in parallel, and that performance is limited by internal noise, which is a function of set size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brainard, D. H. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00357 · Cited by 19,702
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
Owen, D. B., Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266136 · Cited by 16,138
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies
Pelli, D. G. (1997) · Spatial Vision · doi:10.1163/156856897x00366 · Cited by 11,098
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36846 · Cited by 4,071
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables.
Barton, D. E., Abramovitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343473 · Cited by 3,705
Statistics of Directional Data.
Gokhale, D. V., & Mardia, K. V. (1973) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529189 · Cited by 2,442
Statistics of Directional Data
(1972) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07425-7 · Cited by 1,637
Cited by
The Mind and Brain of Short-Term Memory
Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093615 · Cited by 957
A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations
Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/11.5.4 · Cited by 556
In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect
Souza, A. S., & Oberauer, K. (2016) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5 · Cited by 455
Emrich, S. M., Riggall, A. C., LaRocque, J. J., & Postle, B. R. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5732-12.2013 · Cited by 343
How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2011) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0055-3 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2004-12-29
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 11
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065433454
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A detection theory account of change detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/4.12.11
- The paper
- Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.12.11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.