Cited by 153Tactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integration

Perception of object length by sound

Carello, Claudia, Anderson, Krista L., Kunkler-Peck, Andrew J.·1998·Psychological Science

Abstract

Although hearing is classically considered a temporal sense, everyday listening suggests that subtle spatial properties constitute an important part of what people know about the world through sound. Typically neglected in psychoacoustics research, the ability to perceive the precise sizes of objects on the basis of sound was investigated during the routine event of dropping wooden dowels of different lengths onto a hard surface. In two experiments, the ordinal and metrical success of naive listeners was related to length but not to the simple acoustic variables (duration, amplitude, frequency) likely to be related to it. Additional analysis suggests the potential relevance of an object's inertia tensor in constraining perception of that object's length, analogous to the case that has been made for perceiving length by effortful touch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human direction hearing is a naturally integrated sense requiring less training to perceive spatial information accurately.

    “In contrast, human direction hearing is a naturally integrated sense requiring less training to perceive spatial information accurately [17–19].”
  • Humans can recover physical properties from objects causing sound themselves, such as dimensions, shape, or material.

    “Other psychophysical research shows that humans can recover physical properties from objects causing sound themselves, such as dimensions (Carello, Anderson, & Kunkler-Peck, 1998; Lakatos, McAdams, & Caussá, 1997; Houben, Kohlrausch, & Hermes, 2004), shape (Kunkler-Peck & Turvey, 2000; Grassi, 2005), or material (Klatzky, Pai, & Krotkov, 2000; Giordano & McAdams, 2006).”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Carello, Anderson, & Kunkler-Peck, 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carello, C., Anderson, K. L., & Kunkler-Peck, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1998-05
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
211-214
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2168674307
Cited by
153
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
inertia tensor, auditory spatial cues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review