The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Numerical Estimation: Evidence for Multiple Representations of Numerical Quantity
Abstract
We examined children's and adults' numerical estimation and the representations that gave rise to their estimates. The results were inconsistent with two prominent models of numerical representation: the logarithmic-ruler model, which proposes that people of all ages possess a single, logarithmically spaced representation of numbers, and the accumulator model, which proposes that people of all ages represent numbers as linearly increasing magnitudes with scalar variability. Instead, the data indicated that individual children possess multiple numerical representations; that with increasing age and numerical experience, they rely on appropriate representations increasingly often; and that the numerical context influences their choice of representation. The results, obtained with second graders, fourth graders, sixth graders, and adults who performed two estimation tasks in two numerical contexts, strongly suggest that one cause of children's difficulties with estimation is reliance on logarithmic representations of numerical magnitudes in situations in which accurate estimation requires reliance on linear representations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality
MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2151519a0 · Cited by 2,068
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking
Siegler, R. S. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195077872.001.0001 · Cited by 799
Self-citation
Cited by
Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study.
Geary, D. C. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025510 · Cited by 836
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x · Cited by 824
Numerical Magnitude Representations Influence Arithmetic Learning
Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01173.x · Cited by 601
Self-citationThe relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027433 · Cited by 554
Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013 · Cited by 448
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-250
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2136582088
- Cited by
- 1,045
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development of Numerical Estimation: Evidence for Multiple Representations of Numerical Quantity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9280.02438
- The paper
- Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The Development of Numerical Estimation: Evidence for Multiple Representations of Numerical Quantity. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.02438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.