The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Communication as a determinant of organizational innovation
Open accessAbstract
This study of 32 small and medium‐sized industrial enterprises explored eight distinct aspects of communication, as appraised by the staff (n = 493), and innovative performance, assessed by two indicators: perceived innovation effectiveness and patent statistics obtained from the Patent Register at the National Board of Patents and Registration of Trademarks. The results showed that intra‐organizational aspects of communication, such as encouragement of initiatives and critical evaluation of performance, were associated with both indicators of innovative performance. In addition, a participative climate and interaction between the personnel in R&D, marketing and production were related to perceived innovative effectiveness, whereas interaction with clients and other firms related to the number of patents in the organization. The link between communication and innovation was interdependent with the organizational and staff characteristics including the number of personnel, administrative and R&D intensity, the level of vocational training, and the age distribution of the staff.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Communication has a positive effect on innovative behavior.
“There have also been a number of studies that illustrate that communication has a positive effect on innovative behavior [51,58,60,61,106,110].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Participation has a positive effect on innovative behavior.
“There have been many prior studies that have shown that participation has a positive effect on innovative behavior [16,34,58,[106][107][108][109].”
From A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13042079 · Cited by 99
“There have also been a number of studies that illustrate that communication has a positive effect on innovative behavior [51,58,60,61,106,110].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kivimäki, M., Länsisalmi, H., Elovainio, M., Heikkilä, A., Lindström, K., Harisalo, R., Sipilä, K., & Puolimatka, L.
- Affiliations
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
- University of Tampere (FI)
- Foundation for Finnish Inventions (FI)
- National Board of Patents and Registration of Finland (FI)
- ORCID
- Elovainio, Marko
- Venue
- R&D Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-42
- ISSN
- 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9310
- OpenAlex
- W2157706354
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 10.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- R and D Management (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- organizational communication, organizational innovation, small and medium-sized enterprises, innovation performance, patent activity, interdepartmental relations, R&D personnel, client interaction, vocational education, R&D intensity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review