The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts
Abstract
We compare the characteristics of real-world financial contracts to their counterparts in financial contracting theory. We do so by studying the actual contracts between venture capitalists (VCs) and entrepreneurs. The distinguishing characteristic of VC financings is that they allow VCs to separately allocate cash flow rights, board rights, voting rights, liquidation rights, and other control rights. We describe and measure these rights. We then interpret our results in relation to existing financial contracting theories. We also describe the interrelation and the evolution across financing rounds of the different rights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(84)90023-0 · Cited by 18,957
The Provision of Incentives in Firms
Prendergast, C. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7 · Cited by 3,338
Cited by
Platform Tokenization: Financing, Governance, and Moral Hazard
Chod, J., Trichakis, N., & Yang, S. A. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4225 · Cited by 134
Habitual entrepreneurs: possible cases of entrepreneurship addiction?
Spivack, A. J., McKelvie, A., & Haynie, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.11.002 · Cited by 124
Ghio, N., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9958-3 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S. N., & Stromberg, P.
- Venue
- Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-315
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W2913527708
- Cited by
- 1,533
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 195.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
