Cited by 124Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy

Habitual entrepreneurs: possible cases of entrepreneurship addiction?

Spivack, April J., McKelvie, Alexander, Haynie, J. Michael·2014·Journal of Business Venturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.11.002

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spivack, A. J., McKelvie, A., & Haynie, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Spivack, April J.
  • McKelvie, Alexander
  • Haynie, J. Michael
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
651-667
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089088440
Cited by
124
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Keywords
habitual entrepreneurs, behavioral addiction, workaholism, startups, dark side of entrepreneurship, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review