Development and validation of Swedish classical and modern sexism scales
Abstract
In two studies we develop and validate a Classical--overt or direct--and a Modern--covert or subtle--Sexism Scale concerning attitudes toward women, for a Swedish (Scandinavian) context. Further, we examine whether these two forms of prejudice are distinguishable. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that, although highly correlated, classical and modern sexism are distinguishable. The construct validations showed that men had higher means on modern and classical sexism scores than women, and that our scales were related to other constructs as expected. In a third study, we analyzed the knowledge and the content of cultural stereotypes about women. There were no differences in the knowledge of cultural stereotypes between men and women or between high- and low-sexist individuals. The findings are discussed in relation to previous international studies that examine people's modern and/or classical sexism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Gustafsson Sendén et al. (2015), self-reported use of the gender-neutral pronoun hen was negatively correlated with levels of sexism.
“Also, in the Swedish-language study by Gustafsson Sendén et al. (2015), a negative correlation was found between self-reported use of the gender-neutral pronoun hen and levels of sexism, measured by the Swedish version of the Modern Sexism Scale (Ekehammar et al., 2000).”
From What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Ekehammar et al., 2000
Men are higher in sexism compared to women.
“Research has shown for a long time that men are higher in sexism compared to women (e.g. Ekehammar et al., 2000; Swim & Cohen, 1997; Swim et al., 1995).”
From A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns (2025) · cites this paper as Ekehammar et al., 2000
Men as a group, on average, express significantly more sexist attitudes compared to women as a group.
“men as a group, on average, express significantly more sexist attitudes compared to women as a group (Ekehammar et al., 2000; Swim & Cohen, 1997; Swim et al., 1995)”
From A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns (2025) · cites this paper as Ekehammar et al., 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What affects people’s use of and attitudes toward gender-inclusive language? A literature review
Lange, E., & von Stockhausen, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1657753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Sexist Language? Gender Differences in Attitudes and Use of Gender-Inclusive Pronouns
Remsö, A., Bäck, H., & Renström, E. A. (2025) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x251335305 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“This is also what has been found in research, such that men as a group, on average, express signi fi cantly more sexist attitudes compared to women as a group (Ekehammar et al., 2000; Swim & Cohen, 1997; Swim et al., 1995).”
Influential
- Authors
- Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., & Araya, T.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Ekehammar, Bo
- ORCID
- Akrami, Nazar
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-314
- ISSN
- 0036-5564 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9450
- OpenAlex
- W2012764009
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- modern sexism, attitudes toward women, gender stereotypes, gender differences in prejudice, scale development, Swedish language
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Psychological Tests, Sex Factors, Stereotyping, Sweden, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review