The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance
Abstract
A multidimensional, interdisciplinary model of social status was developed and examined in a sample of 487 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade elementary school students. Participants were clustered into seven subtypes (i.e., High Status, Perceived Popular/Dominant, Well‐Liked/Dominant, Average, Low Dominant/Unpopular, Disliked, and Low Status) based on the dimensions of likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance emphasized, respectively, by psychologists working within the sociometric tradition, sociologists of education, and ethologists. The meaningfulness of the cluster solution was supported by cluster differences on peer‐reported social prerogatives of status (e.g., admiration, social control, leadership) and self‐reported social characteristics. Furthermore, each cluster had a distinct behavioral profile. It was argued that a broader, multidisciplinary conceptualization of social status should lead to a better understanding of the complex dynamics present in children's peer groups in middle childhood as well as the tools preadolescents need to successfully navigate the peer system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective
Hawley, P. H. (1999) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 · Cited by 877
Cited by
Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310 · Cited by 2,755
Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x · Cited by 713
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015) · Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science · doi:10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy405 · Cited by 430
Children's Social Constructions of Popularity
Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188 · Cited by 354
Self-citationAn Organizational Impression Management Perspective on the Formation of Corporate Reputations
Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Gregarus, G. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309348788 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., & Axelrod, J. L.
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 508-533
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W2079093366
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9507.00213
- The paper
- Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of Social Status in Preadolescent Peer Groups: Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance. Social Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
