Children's Social Constructions of Popularity
Abstract
Children's social constructions of popularity were assessed with perceived popularity nominations (i.e., ‘Who are the most [least] popular students?’) in a sample of 487 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade elementary school students. Correlational and group‐difference analyses demonstrated that perceived popularity is moderately and positively related to sociometric popularity and social dominance. Perceived popular girls were viewed as prosocial, bright, and in possession of the expressive equipment of popularity (i.e., attractiveness and spending power); perceived popular girls who were not well‐liked (i.e., sociometrically popular) had these characteristics as well but also were above‐average (>.5 SD) on social aggression and social visibility (i.e., cool and athletic). Perceived popular boys were reported to be socially visible (i.e., cool and athletic) and with low levels of social withdrawal; perceived popular boys who were not well‐liked had these characteristics but also were reported to be socially aggressive, attractive, and to possess spending power. Finally, group comparisons revealed that perceived popularity, either alone or in combination with sociometric popularity, is accompanied by more social prerogatives (i.e., admiration, leadership, social control) than sociometric popularity alone. It was argued that being perceived as popular is a key determinant of social power in peer groups of older elementary school students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A high sociometric peer status is a significant predictor of well-being as well as academic success and effective intra- and interpersonal functioning later in life.
“A high sociometric peer status is a significant predictor of well-being as well as academic success and effective intra- and interpersonal functioning later in life (Lease, Kennedy, Axelrod, 2002; Kiuru i in., 2020; Wentzel, Jablansky, Scalise, 2021).”
From The The effects of cognitive, social, and emotional intelligence on children’s sociometric status in a new peer group (2023) · cites this paper as Lease, Kennedy, Axelrod, 2002
A number of studies have consistently confirmed correlations between children's social intelligence and their sociometric peer status.
“Therefore, it is only natural that a number of studies have consistently confirmed correlations between the social intelligence of children and their sociometric peer status (Lease, Kennedy, Axelrod, 2002; Meijs et al., 2010).”
From The The effects of cognitive, social, and emotional intelligence on children’s sociometric status in a new peer group (2023) · cites this paper as Lease, Kennedy, Axelrod, 2002
Cites
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective
Hawley, P. H. (1999) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 · Cited by 877 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x · Cited by 1,917 · see citing works
Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431605279841 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Uses and gratifications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers
Bucknell Bossen, C., & Kottasz, R. (2020) · Young Consumers · doi:10.1108/yc-07-2020-1186 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?
van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity
Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H. N., Scholte, R. H. J., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2010) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9373-9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Shin, H. (2017) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Almquist, Y. (2009) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2009.088377 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
The role of reciprocity in romantic relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence
Carlson, W., & Rose, A. J. (2007) · Merrill-palmer Quarterly · doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0008 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Almquist, Y. B., & Östberg, V. (2013) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04097.x · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Knopp, K. A. (2023) · Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio · doi:10.34766/fetr.v55i3.1218
- Authors
- Lease, A. M., Kennedy, C. A., & Axelrod, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- ORCID
- Lease, A. Michele
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-109
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W1969165780
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- perceived popularity, sociometric popularity, social dominance, social power, peer nominations, social aggression, social visibility, social withdrawal, gender differences, elementary school students, peer groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review