Identifying Children's Peer Social Networks in School Classrooms: Links Between Peer Reports and Observed Interactions
Abstract
Links between peer reports of social cluster membership and observed classroom interactions were examined in a sample of 72 children in 4 th grade and 7 th grade. All participating children in each classroom identified as many social clusters in the classroom as they could recall. Using the social‐cognitive map (SCM) procedure, these individual reports were aggregated to summarize the number of times a given child was nominated as being in the same social cluster as each of his or her classmates (i.e., a co‐nomination profile) and to identify the classmates in each child's social cluster. Extensive classroom observations allowed for a parallel summary of the number of times a given child was observed to interact with each of his or her classmates (i.e., an interaction profile). Results indicated that correlations between conomination profiles and interaction profiles were positive and statistically reliable. Children were observed to interact with members of their SCM‐identified social cluster at a rate four times higher than with other same‐sex classmates. These effects did not vary reliably by grade, sex or aggressive risk status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extensive classroom observations have validated the social-cognitive mapping method, finding observed interaction frequency to correlate reliably with conomination matrices.
“Extensive classroom observations have been used to validate this method, finding observed interaction frequency to correlate reliably with the conomination matrices (Gest, Farmer, Cairns, & Xie, 2003).”
From Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships (2011) · cites this paper as Gest, Farmer, Cairns, & Xie, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L. (2011) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431610384487 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gest, S. D., Farmer, T. W., Cairns, B. D., & Xie, H.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gest, Scott D.
- ORCID
- Farmer, Thomas W.
- Venue
- Social Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-17
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-529
- ISSN
- 0961-205X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9507
- OpenAlex
- W2085063451
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- peer social networks, social clusters, peer nominations, classroom interaction, interaction profiles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review