Cited by 116Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Peer Influences on Academic Motivation: Exploring Multiple Methods of Assessing Youths’ Most “Influential” Peer Relationships

Open access
Molloy, Lauren E., Gest, Scott D., Rulison, Kelly L.·2011·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

The present study examines the relative role of three distinct types of peer relationships (reciprocated friendships, frequent interactions, and shared group membership) in within-year changes in academic self-concept and engagement before and after the transition to middle school (fifth and seventh grade). In a series of linear regression analyses, main effects of each peer type’s academic self-concept and engagement on changes in youths’ academic characteristics were used to test socialization processes. Interactions of youths’ academic skills with those of each peer type were used to test social comparison processes influencing changes in academic self-concept. Results suggest unique roles of each peer relationship differentially influencing changes in youths’ academic adjustment as well as stronger influence effects during seventh than fifth grade. Implications are discussed in terms of distinct influence processes associated with each peer relationship type as well as potential developmental differences in the role that certain peer relationships play.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431610384487

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 71 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In seventh grade, interaction dyads' effort significantly predicted within-year changes in students' academic effort (β = .142, p < .001).

    “significant effects emerged for each of the three peer profile scores predicting changes in youths' effort (Model 1a: β = .161,p < .001for reciprocated friends; Model 1b: β = .142,p < .001for interaction dyads; and Model 1c: β = .136,p < .001for group members).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In fifth grade, no peer scores significantly predicted youths' spring effort in the combined models.

    “No peer scores significantly predict youths' spring effort in the combined fifth-grade models”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    40% to 50% of peers showing one type of dyadic tie (friendship or frequent interaction) did not show the other.

    “In sum, 40% to 50% of peers showing one type of dyadic tie (friendship or frequent interaction) did not show the other”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In fifth grade, a statistically significant interaction term for reciprocated friends influenced youths' academic self-concept (β = .136, p < .05).

    “analyses revealed a statistically significant interaction term for reciprocated friends in fifth grade (Model 1a β = .136,p < .05)influencing youths' academic self-concept”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In seventh grade, group members' effort significantly predicted within-year changes in students' academic effort (β = .136, p < .001).

    “significant effects emerged for each of the three peer profile scores predicting changes in youths' effort (Model 1a: β = .161,p < .001for reciprocated friends; Model 1b: β = .142,p < .001for interaction dyads; and Model 1c: β = .136,p < .001for group members).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Both types of dyadic ties are typically embedded within social groups, more true for interaction dyads (91%) than for friendships (70%).

    “Both types of dyadic ties are typically embedded within social groups, though in the present study this is more true for interaction dyads (91%) than for friendships (70%)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Correlations among peer profile scores ranged from r = .46 to r = .85, strongest between interaction dyads and group members and weakest between friends and group members.

    “these correlations ranged from r = .46to r = .85(Table 1).Correlations were strongest between interaction dyads and group members and weakest between friends and group members.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Patterns of overlap among peer types were similar across grade levels, except that the tendency of group members to be friends dropped from 48% in fifth grade to 26% in seventh grade.

    “Patterns of overlap were similar across grade levels, except that the tendency of group members to be friends dropped from 48% in fifth grade to 26% in seventh grade”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the present study, 61% of friends are also identified as frequent interaction dyads and 53% of interaction dyads are reciprocated friends.

    “we find that 61% of friends are also identified as frequent interaction dyads and 53% of interaction dyads are reciprocated friends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On average, only 52% of group members are also frequent interaction dyads, and only 33% of groupmates are reciprocated friends.

    “on average, only 52% of group members are also frequent interaction dyads, and only 33% of groupmates are reciprocated friends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Socialization effects for interaction dyads and group members were significant only in seventh grade, not fifth.

    “socialization effects for interaction dyads and group members were only significant in seventh grade but not fifth”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Dyadic interaction partners most significantly influenced self-concept through both socialization and social comparison, but only among middle school youth.

    “dyadic interaction partners most significantly influenced self-concept through both socialization and social comparison but only among middle school youth.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Results provide evidence of socialization across all three types of peer relationships, with the most consistent evidence emerging in seventh grade and for peers' influence on academic effort.

    “results provide evidence of socialization across all three types of peer relationships, with the most consistent evidence emerging in seventh grade and for peers' influence on academic effort.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Youths' self-concept became most similar to that of their dyadic interaction partners during seventh grade, and this effect was strongest even when the relative strength of all three peer types was tested simultaneously.

    “Youths' self-concept became most similar to that of their dyadic interaction partners during seventh grade: their effect was strongest even when the relative strength of all three peer types was tested simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Friends' effort was the most significant predictor of effort change in seventh grade and the only significant peer score in fifth grade.

    “Friends' effort was the most significant predictor of effort change in seventh grade and the only significant peer score in fifth grade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Results provide some evidence of social comparison by each peer type influencing youths' academic self-concept, with an apparent shift in comparison target from friends in fifth grade to interaction dyads and group members in seventh grade.

    “results provide some evidence of social comparison by each peer type influencing youths' academic self-concept, with an apparent shift in comparison target from friends in fifth grade to interaction dyads and group members in seventh grade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Less than two thirds of reciprocated friends are identified as frequent interaction dyads, and only about half of frequent interaction dyads are reciprocated friends.

    “Less than two thirds of reciprocated friends are identified as frequent interaction dyads; and only about half of frequent interaction dyads are reciprocated friends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many friends and interaction dyads share social groups, but friendship and dyadic interaction nominations within groups are relatively sparse.

    “While many friends and interaction dyads share social groups, we see relatively sparse friendship and dyadic interaction nominations within groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the fifth-grade combined test, friends' contribution dropped to non-significance but friends remained the strongest predictor.

    “Although their contribution dropped to non-significance in the fifth-grade combined test, friends remained the strongest predictor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Findings suggest some socialization of youths' achievement motivation by each of the three peer types, with variation by age and outcome in the relative strength of each peer type.

    “Findings suggest some socialization of youths' achievement motivation by each of the three peer types, but with variation by age and outcome in the relative strength of each peer type.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In seventh grade, only 26% of group members were also friends and only 48% were dyadic interaction partners.

    “only 26% of group members were also friends and only 48% were dyadic interaction partners”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Distributions of statewide reading and math assessment scores for fifth graders at the school closely matched the distribution for the overall population of fifth graders in the state.

    “Distributions of statewide reading and math assessment scores for fifth graders at the school closely matched the distribution for the overall population of fifth graders in the state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participation rates across all waves were high, ranging from 92% to 95% of enrolled students.

    “Participation rates across all waves were high, ranging from 92% to 95% of enrolled students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The three methods of identifying social ties show substantial overlap yet clear distinctiveness.

    “Results demonstrate substantial overlap yet clear distinctiveness among the three types of social ties.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.

    “Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) found that low-achieving youth in fifth through seventh grade were more likely to report a lower academic self-concept but also higher academic engagement if they had high-achieving friends than if they had low-achieving friends.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Altermatt and Pomerantz (2005) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The results suggest unique roles of each peer relationship differentially influencing changes in youths' academic adjustment, with stronger influence effects during seventh than fifth grade.

    “Results suggest unique roles of each peer relationship differentially influencing changes in youths' academic adjustment as well as stronger influence effects during seventh than fifth grade.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    Results provide more robust evidence of within-year socialization processes influencing students' academic effort in both grade levels than for academic self-concept.

    “Results provide more robust evidence of within-year socialization processes influencing students' academic effort in both grade levels (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early adolescent cognitive development produces greater sensitivity to peer feedback and greater skill at using social comparisons to assess one's own competence level.

    “early adolescent cognitive development produces greater sensitivity to peer feedback and greater skill at using social comparisons to assess one's own competence level (Dweck, 2002)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dweck, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks.

    “studies of adolescents find that affiliation with peers who are highly academically competent may, on the one hand, produce benefits for academic effort by motivating improvements in academic standards and performance, or by providing models for how to complete challenging academic tasks, serving as a form of”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005 source
    • cites Blanton, Buunk, Gibbons, & Kuyper, 1999 source
    • cites Gibbons, Blanton, Gerrard, Buunk, & Eggleston, 2000 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By early adolescence, youth are especially interested in and attuned to social comparisons.

    “by early adolescence, youth are especially interested in and attuned to social comparisons (Dweck, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dweck, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Festinger's original formulation of social comparison theory was based on experiments demonstrating that adults base their aspirations and self-assessments upon group members' performance.

    “Festinger's (1954) original formulation of social comparison theory was based on experiments demonstrating that adults base their aspirations and self-assessments upon group members' performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Festinger (1954) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    No studies have examined social comparison effects among childhood or adolescent peer groups.

    “as of yet, no studies have examined social comparison effects among childhood or adolescent peer groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Festinger's experimentally contrived social groups are quite different from the informal social groups of early adolescence.

    “Festinger's experimentally contrived social groups are quite different from the informal social groups of early adolescence”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Peer influence may peak during early adolescence, as youth spend more time with peers, place increased importance on peer approval and advice, and look to peers as a source of identity.

    “peer influence may peak during early adolescence, as youth spend more time with peers, place increased importance on peer approval and advice, and look to peers as a source of identity (e.g., Brown, 1990;Bukowski, Sippola, & Newcomb, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brown, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bukowski, Sippola, & Newcomb, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Social comparison theories assert that youth evaluate their own skill level by comparing their own abilities with those of their peers, so that youths' academic self-concept should depend on their perceptions of their own skills relative to those of their peer reference group.

    “Social comparison theories assert that youth evaluate their own skill level by comparing their own abilities with those of their peers, so that youths' academic self-concept should depend on their perceptions of their own skills relative to those of their peer reference group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The rewards of group membership may motivate individuals to earn group approval through conformity, and comfortable group interactions require the development and enforcement of group norms.

    “the rewards of group membership (e.g., access to social opportunities) may motivate individuals to earn group approval through conformity, and comfortable group interactions require the development and enforcement of group norms (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thibaut & Kelley, 1959

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    School transitions have been found to increase perceived discrepancies in ability and resources among disadvantaged youth, leading to lower academic self-concepts and avoidance of challenging courses.

    “school transitions have been found to increase perceived discrepancies in ability and resources among disadvantaged youth, leading to lower academic self-concepts and avoidance of challenging courses (e.g., Crosnoe, Riegle-Crumb, & Muller, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crosnoe, Riegle-Crumb, & Muller, 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some researchers argue that adolescents are driven by a need to belong and that identification of a peer group is a major developmental task of early adolescence, with implications for youths' sense of identity and self-perceptions.

    “some researchers argue that adolescents are driven by a need to belong and that identification of a peer group is a major developmental task of early adolescence, with implications for youths' sense of identity and self-perceptions (Baumeister & Leary, 1995;Brown, 1990).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baumeister & Leary, 1995 source
    • cites Brown, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Classic social-psychological theories of social groups highlight their potential relevance to both socialization and social comparison processes.

    “Classic social-psychological theories of social groups highlight their potential relevance to both socialization and social comparison processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Mutual reinforcement and rewards from group members are most efficient when similarity among group members is maximized.

    “it has been argued that mutual reinforcement and rewards from group members are most efficient when similarity among group members is maximized (Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is not clear that Festinger's observed social comparison dynamics were specific to group-level ties; evidence for social comparison effects in studies of close friends suggests that they are not.

    “it is not clear that his observed social comparison dynamics were specific to group-level ties; indeed, the evidence for social comparison effects in studies of close friends suggests that they are not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social comparative behaviors have been observed in early elementary years in the form of glances at peers' progress and comparative remarks.

    “Social comparative behaviors have been observed in early elementary years in the form of glances at peers' progress and comparative remarks (Altermatt, Pomerantz, Ruble, Frey, & Greulich, 2002)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Altermatt, Pomerantz, Ruble, Frey, & Greulich, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The climate of agreement existing between friends promotes socialization toward increased similarity.

    “The”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hartup, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Berndt & Murphy, 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Newcomb & Bagwell, 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The three types of social ties are both conceptually and empirically distinct and worth further investigation.

    “our findings support the hypothesis that these three types of social ties are both conceptually and empirically distinct, and worth further investigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    School effort is an overt, observable behavior, making it a visible group norm, susceptible to reinforcement patterns within interaction dyads, and a likely area of agreement among friends.

    “School effort is an overt, observable behavior, making it a visible group norm (Thibaut & Kelley, 1959), susceptible to reinforcement patterns within interaction dyads (e.g., Sage & Kindermann, 1999), and a likely area of agreement among friends (Berndt et al., 1990).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Thibaut & Kelley, 1959

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sage & Kindermann, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Berndt et al., 1990 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    Sharing and disclosure within children's mutual friendships make them the most psychologically meaningful and accessible target for social comparison.

    “the sharing and disclosure within children's mutual friendships make them the most psychologically meaningful and accessible target for social comparison”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2003 source
    • cites Guay et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    High rates of participation and low rates of attrition allowed examination of differences before versus after the transition to middle school.

    “high rates of participation and low rates of attrition allowed us to examine differences before versus after the transition to middle school”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Most developmentalists believe that dyadic-level relationship processes mostly overshadow group-level processes.

    “Most developmentalists believe that dyadic-level relationship processes mostly overshadow these group-level processes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kindermann & Gest, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Findings may indicate a shift in the developmental significance of informal social groups in middle school and a shift in the importance of frequent interaction dyads.

    “Our findings may also be indicative of the hypothesized shift in the developmental significance of informal social groups in middle school as well as a shift in the importance of frequent interaction dyads”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Identification of a peer group is a major developmental task of early adolescence, with implications for youths' self-perceptions and identity.

    “identification of a peer group as a major developmental task of early adolescence, with implications for youths' self-perceptions and identity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Baumeister & Leary, 1995 source
    • cites Brown, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The shift in affiliation opportunities from classroom-wide to grade cohort-wide between grade levels makes the formation of informal social groups more developmentally distinct and meaningful in early adolescence.

    “the shift in affiliation opportunities from classroom-wide to grade cohort-wide between grade levels makes the formation of informal social groups more developmentally distinct and meaningful in early adolescence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    All methods for identifying peer groups build on some form of dyadic ties, so substantial overlap between peer groups and the dyadic tie upon which group assignment is based is inevitable.

    “As all methods for identifying peer groups build on some form of dyadic ties, substantial overlap between peer groups and the dyadic tie upon which group assignment is based is inevitable”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gest, Moody, & Rulison, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Greater competition for grades and a larger peer reference group may prime changes in achievement motivational patterns.

    “greater competition for grades and a larger peer reference group may further prime changes in achievement motivational patterns”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Crosnoe et al., 2007 source
    • cites Schunk & Pajares, 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Interaction dyads are defined by frequent contact, and evaluative discourse and social learning processes underlie their theoretical importance in socializing academic outcomes.

    “Interaction dyads, however, are defined by frequent contact; as such, evaluative discourse and social learning processes underlie the theoretical importance of these peers in socializing academic outcomes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kindermann, 2007 source
    • cites Sage & Kindermann, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Friendship qualities are the strongest peer processes driving youths' engagement in school, and friends maintain their role as an important source of academic socialization across grade levels.

    “such friendship qualities are the strongest peer processes driving youths' engagement in school and that friends maintain their role as an important source of academic socialization across grade levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Rewards provided by group membership, such as access to resources and a source of identity and status, may motivate conformity to group norms.

    “rewards provided by group membership, such as access to resources and a source of identity and status, may motivate conformity to group norms”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brown, 1990

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Thibaut & Kelley, 1959

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Social groups are an important source of youths' identity.

    “social groups are an important source of youths' identity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Thibaut & Kelley, 1959

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    These results highlight the usefulness of considering multiple types of social ties in studies of academic social comparison.

    “These results highlight the usefulness of considering multiple types of social ties in studies of academic social comparison.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Limited research has examined how social comparison processes operate among different types of peer relationships.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Youth attending much larger or more diverse schools may have different peer experiences, and the factors shaping academic views and behaviors likely also vary by school or community.

    “Youth attending much larger or more diverse schools may have different peer experiences; and the factors shaping academic views and behaviors likely also vary by school or community.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The time frame over which peer influence processes unfold is uncertain, and peers may have already exerted much of their influence before the first assessment date or important influence processes may be best revealed over periods of days or weeks.

    “The time frame over which peer influence processes unfold is uncertain, and it may be that peers have already exerted much of their influence before the first assessment date or that important influence processes would be best revealed over periods of days or weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
55 of 55
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Significant regression weights for peer profile variables can be interpreted as socialization effects of that peer type influencing within-year changes in youths' motivational outcomes.

    “Significant regression weights for any of these peer profile variables are interpreted as socialization effects of that particular peer type influencing withinyear changes in youths' motivational outcomes.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The interaction between youths' academic skills and peers' skills can be used to infer social comparison processes in which the effect of peers' academic skills on changes in youths' academic self-concept is moderated by youths' own academic skill level.

    “In this equation, the interaction term is used to infer social comparison processes in which the effect of peers' academic skills on changes in youths' academic self-concept are moderated by youths' own academic skill level (e.g., Altermatt & Pomerantz, 2005;Guay et al., 1999).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Prediction of spring scores controlling for fall scores can be interpreted as within-year changes in youths' motivational characteristics.

    “students' own fall scores are included as control variables so that prediction of spring scores can be interpreted as changes in youths' motivational characteristics as a function of peers' characteristics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Limited research has examined how social comparison processes operate among different types of peer relationships.

    “Limited research has examined how social comparison processes operate among different types of peer relationships.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Past literature has rarely teased apart the multiple mechanisms by which peers shape academic outcomes throughout development.

    “Past literature has rarely teased apart the multiple mechanisms by which peers shape academic outcomes throughout development.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A challenge in the literature is empirically identifying the distinct theoretical processes associated with adolescent peer groups.

    “A challenge in the literature is empirically identifying the distinct theoretical processes associated with adolescent peer groups.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    When considering the properties of each relationship, each may be theoretically linked to certain influence processes.

    “When considering the properties of each relationship, each may be theoretically linked to certain influence processes.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As children transition into middle school, there is increased competition for grades and typically a larger pool of peers that serve as a reference group.

    “As children transition into middle school, there is increased competition for grades and typically a larger pool of peers that serve as a reference group (Molloy et al., 2011).”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Molloy et al., 2011

  • Peer relationships show a stronger influence on academic self-concept for seventh graders compared to fifth graders.

    “peer relationships show a stronger influence on academic self-concept for seventh graders, compared to fifth graders (Molloy et al., 2011).”

    From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Molloy et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Fifth-grade friend interaction coefficient differs between text and table

    Minor

    The text gives the fifth-grade Model 1a friend interaction coefficient as .136, while the corresponding table entry is .139. These are different values at the same printed precision.

  • Combined fifth-grade self-concept model has a lower R2 than its component models

    Minor

    The fifth-grade combined model reports R2 = .154, below the separate friend, dyad, and group models' values of .165, .158, and .181. Because the combined model includes all three peer scores, its R2 cannot be lower than that of a component model fitted to the same stated sample.

  • Combined fifth-grade effort model has a lower R2 than two component models

    Minor

    The fifth-grade combined effort model reports R2 = .579, below the separate dyad and group models' values of .585 and .586. Adding their peer scores to a model fitted to the same stated sample cannot reduce R2.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bagwell, C.L., 2000, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280
  2. Eccles, J.S. & Midgley, C. ( 1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-181). New York: Academic Press.
  3. Gest, S.D., 2006, Journal of Social Structure
  4. Harter, S., 1982, Child Development, 61, 89
  5. Patterson, G.R., 1992, Antisocial boys: A social interactional approach
  6. Sage, N.A., 1999, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 143

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molloy, L. E., Gest, S. D., & Rulison, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Molloy, Lauren E.
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2010-11-04
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
13-40
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2158894040
Cited by
116
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0624150)
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Minnesota
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA017629, T32DA017629)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
peer influence, academic motivation, academic self-concept, academic engagement, peer relationships, friendship, social comparison, socialization, middle school transition, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review