Cited by 148Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityFood, Nutrition, and Cultural PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Practising thrift at dinnertime: mealtime leftovers, sacrifice and family membership

Cappellini, Benedetta, Parsons, Elizabeth·2012·The Sociological Review

Abstract

Exploring our relationship with mealtime leftovers tells us a lot about not only our relationships with waste, but with one another, in the home. In our study of British mealtimes we explore how leftovers are transformed and reused as meals. We refer to theories of disposal in exploring the skills involved in transforming leftovers. We also explore the motivations behind these transformations. Drawing on the work of Miller (1998) we examine how the reuse of leftovers involves sacrifice by individual family members for the greater good of the whole family. We also find that reusing and eating up leftovers involves a collective sacrifice by family members which marks out their membership to the family unit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-954x.12041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More sociological contributions, most notably social practice theory, have provided an additional, complementary lens on the issue of food waste.

    “In response, more sociological contributions, most notably evolving around social practice theory, have provided an additional, complementary lens on the issue of food waste”
  • Families with children find it difficult to predict whether their children will be eating at home at all.

    “Second, families with children find it difficult to predict whether their children will be eating at home at all (Cappellini and Parsons, 2012;Evans, 2011a;Ganglbauer et al., 2013;Porpino et al., 2015).”
  • Especially households with children generate more waste from meals, given the rather unpredictable eating patterns and preferences of children.

    “Some studies suggest that especially households with children generate more waste from meals, given the rather unpredictable eating patterns and preferences of children (Cappellini and Parsons, 2012;Evans, 2011aEvans, , 2012)).”
  • Family members might not like new recipes.

    “also, family members might not like new recipes (Cappellini and Parsons, 2012;Evans, 2012b;Farr-Wharton et al., 2014).”
  • Cooking with what is found in the fridge requires time, knowledge and cooking skills to better utilise food creatively.

    “A barrier to 'food waste cooking' is that cooking with what is found in the fridge requires time, knowledge and cooking skills to better utilise food creatively; also, family members might not like new recipes (Cappellini and Parsons, 2012;Evans, 2012b;Farr-Wharton et al., 2014).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 148

Authors
Cappellini, B., & Parsons, E.
Venue
The Sociological Review
Published
2012-12
Volume
60
Issue
2_suppl
Pages
121-134
ISSN
  • 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-954X
OpenAlex
W2146028332
Cited by
148
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food waste, thrift, food reuse, family membership, sacrifice, disposal, household food practices, collective sacrifice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review