The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period
Abstract
In recent decades, the individual has become more and more central in both national and world cultural accounts of the operation of society. This continues a long historical process, intensified by the consolidation of a more global polity and the weakening of the primordial sovereignty of the national state. Increasingly, society is culturally rooted in the natural, historical, and spiritual worlds through the individual, rather than through corporate entities or groups. The shift has produced a proliferation and specification of individual roles, accounting for what individuals do in society. It has also produced an expansion in recognized individual personhood, accounting for who individuals are in the extrasocial cosmos and fueling elaborated personal tastes and preferences. Where it has been contested, the shift to the individual has also produced a rise in specializing identities (e.g., in such domains as ethnicity or gender). These offer accounts of individuals' distinctive linkages to the cosmos, and they serve to bolster individual claims to standard roles and personhood. Over time, specializing identities tend to get absorbed into roles and personhood. And in turn, expanded roles and personhood provide further bases for specializing identity claims. Because many theorists mischaracterize the relationship of specializing identities to roles and personhood, the literature often overemphasizes the anomic character of the identity explosion and the closeness of the coupling between social roles and identity claims. On the contrary, specializing identities tend to be edited to remain within general rules of individual personhood and to be disconnected from the obligations involved in institutionalized roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1023/a:1007068714468 · Cited by 3,139
Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma
Gamson, J. (1995) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3096854 · Cited by 921
The medical construction of gender: case management of intersexed infants
Kessler, S. J. (1990) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494643 · Cited by 478
Cited by
From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.684462 · Cited by 1,656
Indulging Our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by Field of Study in 44 Countries
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/595942 · Cited by 996
World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor
Meyer, J. W. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506 · Cited by 816
Self-citationIntroduction: theorizing and studying institutional work
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009) · Institutional Work · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511596605.001 · Cited by 502
Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088874 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W.
- Venue
- Sociological Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-105
- ISSN
- 0735-2751 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9558
- OpenAlex
- W2010450259
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9558.00152
- The paper
- Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Postwar Period. Sociological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.