Health and media: an overview
Abstract
Why should medical sociologists study the media? Accounts of the experience of illness are common in medical sociology (see, for example, recent reviews of this field by Pierret 2003 and Lawton 2003). The information these provide has been helpful over the years in re-orienting the vision of health care providers away from a biomedical and reductionist view of patienthood, towards a more holistic understanding of the meanings of illness for those who experience it. In this way many sociologists have contributed to a more widespread construction of 'patients' (passive) as being instead 'consumers' (active), promoting recognition of the psychosocial element of biopsychosocial care. Thus the medical gaze has been extended to parts of life previously hidden from view, so that a new knowledge of illness has come to dominate thinking in certain health care arenas – perhaps particularly so in primary care and in nursing (Armstrong 1983a, 1984). In tandem with these developments has been the emergence of media and cultural studies as new disciplines. These have taken the (mass) mediated nature of personal experience to be an important topic. This can be understood as a component of the broader project of understanding what it is to be a person in late or postmodern social conditions. Thus it is very common, in these fields, to see accounts of media representations of gender, class or race (for example, Dines and Humez 2002), because these are felt to be important factors in understan…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Lay experiences of health and illness: past research and future agendas
Julia, L. (2003) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00338 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dempster, G., Sutherland, G., & Keogh, L. (2022) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.21010206 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Our biggest killer”: multimodal discourse representations of dementia in the British press
Brookes, G., Harvey, K., Chadborn, N., & Dening, T. (2018) · Social Semiotics · doi:10.1080/10350330.2017.1345111 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Gendering attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a discursive analysis of UK newspaper stories
Horton-Salway, M. (2013) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105312456326 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seale, C.
- Affiliations
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Seale, Clive
- Venue
- Sociology of Health & Illness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08-14
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 513-531
- ISSN
- 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9566
- OpenAlex
- W2118563169
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 129.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Keywords
- media and health, illness experience, patienthood, biopsychosocial care, identity construction, medical sociology, new media, postmodern subjectivity, medical gaze, patient as consumer, sociological theory
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Health, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Disease, Health Services Research, Humans, Mass Media, Sociology, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review