Conflict amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration
Abstract
A major reform surge that began in the mid-1980s has generated a renewed interest in fostering teacher community or collaboration as a means to counter isolation, improve teacher practice and student learning, build a common vision for schooling, and foster collective action around school reform. The term community often conjures images of a culture of consensus, shared values, and social cohesion. Yet, in practice, when teachers collaborate, they run headlong into enormous conflicts over professional beliefs and practices. In their optimism about caring and supportive communities, advocates often underplay the role of diversity, dissent, and disagreement in community life, leaving practitioners ill-prepared and conceptions of collaboration underexplored. This article draws on micropolitical and organizational theory to examine teacher communities. Building from case studies of two urban, public middle schools, this article shows that when teachers enact collaborative reforms in the name of community, what emerges is often conflict. The study challenges current thinking on community by showing that conflict is not only central to community, but how teachers manage conflicts, whether they suppress or embrace their differences, defines the community borders and ultimately the potential for organizational learning and change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teams that achieve higher student learning gains use more higher-level thinking skills.
“Research shows that more successful teams (i.e., teams that achieve higher student learning gains) employ more higher level thinking skills”
From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Achinstein, 2002
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209345158 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Data teams for school improvement
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2016) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
The teacher study group as a space for agency in an era of accountability and compliance
Masuda, A. M. (2010) · Teacher Development · doi:10.1080/13664530.2010.533489 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Nature of Teacher Learning in Collaborative Data Teams
Michaud, R. (2016) · The Qualitative Report · doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2316 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Achinstein, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Corresponding author
- Achinstein, Betty
- Venue
- Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 421-455
- ISSN
- 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 0161-4681
- 1467-9620
- OpenAlex
- W2165116374
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 36.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Keywords
- teacher collaboration, teacher communities, conflict, micropolitics, organizational theory, educational reform, teacher isolation, dissent, diversity, organizational learning, junior high school, urban public schools, collective action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review