Cited by 570Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation Pedagogy and PracticesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Conflict amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration

Achinstein, Betty·2002·Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education

Abstract

A major reform surge that began in the mid-1980s has generated a renewed interest in fostering teacher community or collaboration as a means to counter isolation, improve teacher practice and student learning, build a common vision for schooling, and foster collective action around school reform. The term community often conjures images of a culture of consensus, shared values, and social cohesion. Yet, in practice, when teachers collaborate, they run headlong into enormous conflicts over professional beliefs and practices. In their optimism about caring and supportive communities, advocates often underplay the role of diversity, dissent, and disagreement in community life, leaving practitioners ill-prepared and conceptions of collaboration underexplored. This article draws on micropolitical and organizational theory to examine teacher communities. Building from case studies of two urban, public middle schools, this article shows that when teachers enact collaborative reforms in the name of community, what emerges is often conflict. The study challenges current thinking on community by showing that conflict is not only central to community, but how teachers manage conflicts, whether they suppress or embrace their differences, defines the community borders and ultimately the potential for organizational learning and change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9620.00168

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teams that achieve higher student learning gains use more higher-level thinking skills.

    “Research shows that more successful teams (i.e., teams that achieve higher student learning gains) employ more higher level thinking skills”

    From Data teams for school improvement (2016) · cites this paper as Achinstein, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Achinstein, B.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Achinstein, Betty
Venue
Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education
Published
2002-03
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
421-455
ISSN
  • 0040-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0161-4681
  • 1467-9620
OpenAlex
W2165116374
Cited by
570
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
FWCI
36.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
teacher collaboration, teacher communities, conflict, micropolitics, organizational theory, educational reform, teacher isolation, dissent, diversity, organizational learning, junior high school, urban public schools, collective action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review