Cited by 28Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesTeacher Education and Assessments

The teacher study group as a space for agency in an era of accountability and compliance

Masuda, Avis M.·2010·Teacher Development

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of discourses upon teachers who strive to be professionals amidst the US No Child Left Behind era. Using qualitative research methodology and ethnographic techniques, a case study was conducted within the context of a teacher learning community comprised of two female secondary teachers and the researcher. Data were collected via transcripts of the conversations, teacher interviews, written reflections and field notes. Discourse analysis was employed to unpack discourses operating within the context of the teacher learning community. The study illustrates the push–pull relationship between constraint and possibility for teacher professionals. The paper illuminates how a teacher learning community becomes a space for agency for the ‘teacher as professional’ and how teacher development can be sustained within a contemporary context of compliance and accountability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13664530.2010.533489

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Connections have been made between professional learning communities and teacher agency, with professional learning communities seen as an affordance for the exercise of teacher agency.

    “Connections have been made between professional learning communities and teacher agency, with professional learning communities seen as an affordance for the exercise of teacher agency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Education Week . 2010 . Executive summary. Holding states, nation to educational account . Quality Counts 2010 , http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2010/01/14/index.html
  2. Florio‐Ruane , Susan and Raphael , Taffy E. 2001 . “ Reading lives: Learning about culture and literacy in teacher study groups ” . In Talking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning , Edited by: Clark , Christopher M. 64 – 81 . New York : Teachers College Press .
  3. 10.3102/00028312029002373 · DOI
  4. Kohn , Alfie. 2002 . Fighting the toxic status quo . English Education , 95 : 95 – 103 .
  5. Luke , Allan , Freebody , Peter and Land , Ray . 2000 . Literate futures: New Times, new literacies , Brisbane, Australia : Education Queensland .
  6. Van Sluys , Katie. 2007 . Creating professional communities of practice . School Talk , 12 ( 2 ) : 1 – 5 .
  7. Vasquez , Vivian and Egawa , Kathryn . 2002 . Rethinking the literacy curriculum: The Bailey’s Elementary School reading initiative study group . School Talk , 8 ( 1 ) : 1 – 2 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masuda, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Hawaii System (US)
Corresponding author
Masuda, Avis M.
Venue
Teacher Development
Published
2010-11
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
467-481
ISSN
  • 1366-4530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-5120
OpenAlex
W1986547046
Cited by
28
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teacher Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
teacher study groups, teacher learning communities, teacher agency, teacher professionalism, No Child Left Behind Act, educational accountability, compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review