The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation
Abstract
Economic network theory emphasises the importance of external resource mobilisation. In this paper, the relations between the mobilisation and use of internal and external resources in innovation processes, and the innovative performance of firms, are explored empirically, using an adapted version of Håkansson's (1987) economic network model. The main research question was: to what extent do network variables contribute to the innovative performance of firms? To answer this question, we assessed the explanatory power of economic network theory within the empirical study of innovation. Firms were found to engage in various configurations of internal and external resource bases, enabling them to innovate with better results. The relations in the estimated models are strongly influenced by moderating variables such as sector, and type and level of innovations produced. Our main conclusion is that models that include both internal and external resources explain the innovative performance better than models in which only internal resources are used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The fruit flies of innovations: a taxonomy of innovative small firms
de Jong, J. P. J., & Marsili, O. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.007 · Cited by 445
Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: A firm-level analysis
Mansury, M. A., & Love, J. H. (2008) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.06.002 · Cited by 344
Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J. (2002) · International Regional Science Review · doi:10.1177/016001702762039402 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H., & Boekema, F. W. M.
- Venue
- Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-309
- ISSN
- 0040-747X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9663
- OpenAlex
- W2138021882
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9663.00029
- The paper
- Oerlemans, L. A. G., Meeus, M. T. H., & Boekema, F. W. M. (1998). Do Networks Matter for Innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.