Cited by 237Regional Development and InnovationRegional Economics and Spatial AnalysisUniversity-Industry-Government Innovation Models

The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems

Oinas, Päivi, Malecki, Edward J.·2002·International Regional Science Review

Abstract

Complementing existing approaches on national innovation systems (NISs) and regional innovation systems (RISs), the proposed spatial innovation systems (SISs) approach incorporates a focus on the path-dependent evolution of specific technologies as components of technological systems and the intermingling of their technological paths among various locations through time. SISs utilize spatial divisions of labor among several specialized RISs, possibly in more than one NIS. The SIS concept emphasizes the external relations of actors as key elements that transcend all existing systems of innovation. The integrating role of these relations remains inadequately understood to date. This poses a challenge for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/016001702762039402

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex products and platform technologies rely on the division of labor across regional ecosystems and often countries, and both the interactions within and outside the entrepreneurial ecosystem are vital for technological progress.

    “Complex products and platform technologies rely on the division of labor across regional ecosystems and often coun -tries, and both the interactions within and outside the entrepreneurial ecosystem are vital for technological progress ( Oinas & Malecki, 2002).”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Oinas & Malecki, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oinas, P., & Malecki, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Oinas, Päivi
  • Malecki, Edward J.
Venue
International Regional Science Review
Published
2002-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
102-131
ISSN
  • 0160-0176 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6925
OpenAlex
W1997397910
Cited by
237
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Regional Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Keywords
national innovation system, regional innovation systems, technological evolution, path dependence, technical systems, spatial division of labor, technology diffusion, geography of innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review