Cited by 215Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development

Open access
Levesque, Kyle C., Breadmore, Helen L., Deacon, S. Hélène·2021·Journal of Research in Reading

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A defining feature of language lies in its capacity to represent meaning across oral and written forms. Morphemes, the smallest units of meaning in a language, are the fundamental building blocks that encode meaning, and morphological skills enable their effective use in oral and written language. Increasing evidence indicates that morphological skills are linked to literacy outcomes, including word reading, spelling and reading comprehension. Despite this evidence, the precise ways in which morphology influences the development of children's literacy skills remain largely underspecified in theoretical models of reading and spelling development. In this paper, we draw on the extensive empirical evidence base in English to explicitly detail how morphology might be integrated into models of reading and spelling development. In doing so, we build on the perspective that morphology is multidimensional in its support of literacy development. The culmination of our efforts is the Morphological Pathways Framework – an adapted framework that illuminates precise mechanisms by which morphology impacts word reading, spelling and reading comprehension. Through this framework, we bring greater clarity and specificity on how the use of morphemes in oral and written language supports the development of children's literacy skills. We also highlight gaps in the literature, revealing important areas to focus future research to improve theoretical understanding. Furthermore, this paper provides valuable theoretical insight that will guide future empirical inquiries in identifying more precise morphological targets for intervention, which may have widespread implications for informing literacy practices in the classroom and educational policies more broadly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9817.12313

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One of the key ways in which morphological awareness impacts reading comprehension outcomes is through lexical inferencing on the basis of morphological cues, also referred to as morphological analysis.

    “One of the key ways in which morphological awareness impacts reading comprehension outcomes is through lexical inferencing on the basis of morphological cues, also referred to as morphological analysis (Levesque, Breadmore, & Deacon, 2020).”

    From Use of morphological and contextual cues in children’s lexical inferencing in L1 and L2 (2021) · cites this paper as Levesque, Breadmore, & Deacon, 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 94

  1. Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology , 3 , 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 · DOI
  2. Angelelli, P., Marinelli, C.V ., De Salvatore, M., & Burani, C. (2017). Morpheme-based reading and spelling in Italian children with developmental dyslexia and dysorthography. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 23 (4), 387-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.1554 · DOI
  3. Anglin, J.M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (10, Serial no. 238), 1-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1166112 · DOI
  4. Baumann, J.F., Edwards, E.C., Font, G., Tereshinski, C.A., Kame'enui, E.J., & Olejnik, S. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly , 37 (2), 150-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.2.3 · DOI
  5. Berninger, V.W., Fuller, F., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A process model of writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review , 8 (3), 193-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01464073 · DOI
  6. Bertram, R., Laine, M., & Virkkala, M.M. (2000). The role of derivational morphology in vocabulary acquisition: Get by with a little help from my morpheme friends. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology , 41 (4), 287-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00201 · DOI
  7. Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2012). Morphological processing during visual word recognition in developing readers: Evidence from masked priming. The Quarterly
  8. Beyersmann, E., Ziegler, J.C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Kezilas, Y ., & Grainger, J. (2016). Morpho-orthographic segmentation without semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 23 (2), 533-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0927-z · DOI
  9. Bonin, P., Méot, A., Lagarrigue, A., & Roux, S. (2015). Written object naming, spelling to dictation, and immediate copying: Different tasks, different pathways? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68 (7), 1268-1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.978877 · DOI
  10. Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition , 108 , 243-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.010 · DOI
  11. Breadmore, H.L., & Deacon, S.H. (2019). Morphological processing before and during spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23 (2), 178-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1499745 · DOI
  12. Carlisle, J.F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing , 12 , 169-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604 · DOI
  13. Carlisle, J.F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In R.K. Wagner, A.E. Muse, & K.R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78-103). Guilford.
  14. Carlisle, J.F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45 (4), 464-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5 · DOI
  15. Carlisle, J.F., & Goodwin, A.P. (2013). Morphemes matter: How morphological knowledge contributes to reading and writing. In C.A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren, & G.P. Wallach (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 265282). Guilford.
  16. Carlisle, J.F., & Kearns, D.M. (2017). Learning to read morphologically complex words. In K. Cain, D.L. Compton, & R.K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading comprehension (pp. 192214). John Benjamins.
  17. Carlisle, J.F., & Stone, C.A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly , 40 (4), 428-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 · DOI
  18. Casalis, S., Deacon, S.H., & Pacton, S. (2011). How specific is the connection between morphological awareness and spelling? A study of French children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32 (3), 499-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s014271641100018x · DOI
  19. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 19 , 5-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Coltheart, M. (2006). Dual route and connectionist models of reading: An overview. London Review of Education , 4 (1), 5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13603110600574322 · DOI
  21. Crosson, A.C., & McKeown, M.G. (2016). Middle school learners' use of Latin roots to infer the meaning of unfamiliar words. Cognition and Instruction , 34 (2), 148-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1145121 · DOI
  22. D'Alessio, M.J., Jaichenco, V., & Wilson, M.A. (2018). The role of morphology in word naming in Spanish-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics , 39 , 1065-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000127 · DOI
  23. Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 44 (4), 645-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000485 · DOI
  24. Deacon, S.H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children's knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science, 11 (3), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00684.x · DOI
  25. Deacon, S.H., & Bryant, P. (2006). This turnip's not for turning: Children's morphological awareness and their use of root morphemes in spelling. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24 (3), 567-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151005x50834 · DOI
  26. Deacon, S.H., & Dhooge, S. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children's spelling. Reading and Writing , 23 (9), 1055-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9195-5 · DOI
  27. Deacon, S.H., & Kirby, J.R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just 'more phonological'? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 , 223-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Deacon, S.H., & Leung, D. (2012). Testing the statistical learning of spelling patterns by manipulating semantic and orthographic frequency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34 (6), 1093-1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0142716412000173. · DOI
  29. Deacon, S.H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children's learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology , 49 (2), 118-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118 · DOI
  30. Deacon, S.H., Kirby, J.R., & Casselman-Bell, M. (2009). How robust is the contribution of morphological awareness to general spelling outcomes? Reading Psychology, 30 (4), 301318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702710802412057 · DOI
  31. Deacon, S.H., Tong, X., & Francis, K. (2017). The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading , 40 , 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12056 · DOI
  32. Deacon, S.H., Tong, X., & Mimeau, C. (2019). Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. In C. Perfetti, K. Pugh, & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages and writing systems (pp. 327-349). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553377.015 · DOI
  33. Deacon, S.H., Whalen, R., & Kirby, J.R. (2011). Do children see the danger in dangerous? Grade 4, 6, and 8 children's reading of morphologically complex words. Applied Psycholinguistics , 32 (3), 467-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000166 · DOI
  34. Diamanti, V., Angeliki, M., Ralli, A., Antoniou, F., Papaioannou, S., & Protopapas, A. (2017). Preschool phonological and morphological awareness as longitudinal predictors of early reading and spelling development in Greek. Frontiers in Psychology , 8 , 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02039 · DOI
  35. Diependaele, K., Grainger, J., & Sandra, D. (2012). Derivational morphology and skilled reading: an empirical overview. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 311-332). Cambridge University Press.
  36. Duncan, L.G. (2018). Language and reading: The role of morpheme and phoneme awareness. Current Developmental Disorders Reports , 5 , 226-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40474018-0153-2 · DOI
  37. Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading , 9 , 167-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902\_4 · DOI
  38. Ehri, L.C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading , 18 (1), 5-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356 · DOI
  39. Feldman, L.B., O'Connor, P.A., & del Prado Martín, F.M. (2009) Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of formthen-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 16 , 684691. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.684 · DOI
  40. Foorman, B.R., Petscher, Y., & Bishop, M.D. (2012). The incremental variance of morphological knowledge to reading comprehension in grades 3-10 beyond prior reading comprehension, spelling, and text reading efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 792-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.009 · DOI
  41. Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 35 (5), 263-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841 · DOI
  42. Frost, R., Grainger, J., & Rastle, K. (2005). Current issues in morphological processing: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes , 20 , 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000287 · DOI
  43. Goodwin, A.P., Lipsky, M., & Ahn, S. (2012). Word detectives: Using units of meaning to support literacy. The Reading Teacher , 65 (7), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01069 · DOI
  44. Goodwin, A.P., Petscher, Y., Carlisle, J.F., & Mitchell, A.M. (2017). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological knowledge for adolescent readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 40 , 91-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12064 · DOI
  45. Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertand, D., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J.C. (2012). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition , 123 (2), 280-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.003 · DOI
  46. Hasenäcker, J., Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Investigating developmental trajectories of morphemes as reading units in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 43 (7), 1093-1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000353 · DOI
  47. Hiebert, E.H., Goodwin, A.P., & Cervetti, G.N. (2018). Core vocabulary: Its morphological content and presence in exemplar texts. Reading Research Quarterly , 53 , 29-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.183 · DOI
  48. Kandel, S., Álvarez, C.J., & Vallée, N. (2008). Morphemes also serve as processing units in handwriting production. In M. Baciu (Ed.), Neuropsychology and Cognition of Language
  49. Kandel, S., Spinelli, E., Tremblay, A., Guerassimovitch, H., & Álvarez, C.J. (2012). Processing prefixes and suffixes in handwriting production. Acta Psychologica, 140 (3), 187-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.005 · DOI
  50. Kearns, D.M. (2015). How elementary-age children read polysyllabic polymorphemic words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 (2), 364-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037518 · DOI
  51. Kemp, N. (2006). Children's spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing , 19, 737-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9001-6 · DOI
  52. Kieffer, M.J., Petscher, Y., Proctor, C.P., & Silverman, R.D. (2016). Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading , 20 (6), 436454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1214591 · DOI
  53. Kirby, J.R., & Bowers, P.N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In K. Cain, D.L. Compton, & R.K. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437-462). John Benjamins.
  54. Kirby, J.R., & Savage, R.S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy , 42 (2), 75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x · DOI
  55. Kirby, J.R., Deacon, S.H., Bowers, P.N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children's morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing , 25 (2), 389410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 · DOI
  56. Kruk, R.S., & Bergman, K. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 114 (1), 10-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014 · DOI
  57. Kuo, L., & Anderson, R.C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A crosslanguage perspective. Educational Psychologist , 41 (3), 161-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103 · DOI
  58. Lehtonen, A., & Bryant, P.E. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics , 26 , 137-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017.S0142716405050113
  59. Levesque, K.C., Kieffer, M.J., & Deacon, S.H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 160 , 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015 · DOI
  60. Levesque, K.C., Kieffer, M.J., & Deacon, S.H. (2019). Inferring meaning from meaningful parts: The contributions of morphological skills to the development of children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 54 (1), 63-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.219 · DOI
  61. Manolitsis, G., Grigorakis, I., & Georgiou, G.K. (2017). The longitudinal contribution of early morphological awareness skills to reading fluency and comprehension in Greek. Frontiers in Psychology , 8 , 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01793 · DOI
  62. Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics , 32 (3), 513-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000191 · DOI
  63. McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R.K., Muse, A., Chow, B.W.-Y., & Shu, H. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics , 26 (3), 415-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S014271640505023X · DOI
  64. Nagy, W.E., Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R.D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology , 98 , 134-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Nagy, W.E., Carlisle, J.F., & Goodwin, A.P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 47 (1), 3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509967 · DOI
  66. Nation, K. (2009). Form-meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences , 364 , 3665-3674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0119 · DOI
  67. Northey, M., McCutchen, D., & Sanders, E.A. (2016). Contributions of morphological skill to children's essay writing. Reading and Writing, 29 (1), 47-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9579-7 · DOI
  68. Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2011). Morphemic approaches for reading words. In P. Vadasy & R. O'Connor (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 88-112). Guilford.
  69. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Barros, R. (2012). The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology , 104 (4), 959-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027412 · DOI
  70. Olive, T. (2014). Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination. Journal of Writing Research, 6 (2), 173-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.06.02.4 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Oliveira, M., Levesque, K.C., Deacon, S.H., & da Mota, M.M.P.E. (2020). Evaluating models of how morphological awareness connects to reading comprehension: A study in Portuguese. Journal of Research in Reading , 43 (2), 161-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/14679817.12296 · DOI
  72. Pacheco, M.B., & Goodwin, A.P. (2013). Putting two and two together: Middle school students' morphological problem-solving strategies for unknown words. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy , 56 (7), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.181 · DOI
  73. Perfetti, C.A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading , 11 (4), 357-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Perfetti, C.A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-213). John Benjamins.
  75. Perfetti, C.A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading , 18 (1), 22-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch13 · DOI
  77. Quémart, P., & Lambert, E. (2019). The influence of the morphological structure of words on the dynamics of handwriting in adults and fourth and sixth grade children. Reading and Writing, 32 (1), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9762-0 · DOI
  78. Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 109 (4), 478-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.008 · DOI
  79. Quémart, P., Gonnerman, L.M., Downing, J., & Deacon, S.H. (2018). The development of morphological representations in young readers: A cross-modal priming study. Developmental Science , 21 (4), 1 -10. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12607 · DOI
  80. Rabin, J., & Deacon, S.H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language , 35 (2), 453-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008525 · DOI
  81. Rastle, K. (2018). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex , 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008 · DOI
  82. Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes , 23 , 942-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802069730 · DOI
  83. Roman, A.A., Kirby, J.R., Parrila, R.K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S.H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 102 , 96-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004 · DOI
  84. Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes , 9 , 227-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402119 · DOI
  85. Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew mental lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16 (5), 383-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.571327 · DOI
  86. Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R.K., Foorman, B.R., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, E.L., & Bishop, M.D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing , 28 (7), 959-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0 · DOI
  87. Suárez-Coalla, P., Martínez-García, C., & Cuetos, F. (2017). Morpheme-based reading and writing in Spanish children with dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 , 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01952 · DOI
  88. Taft, M. (2003) Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113-137). Springer.
  89. Tong, X., Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2017). Unpacking the relation between morphological awareness and Chinese word reading: Levels of morphological awareness and vocabulary. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 48 , 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.003 · DOI
  90. Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children's spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141-170. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0045 · DOI
  91. Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 , 642-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.642 · DOI
  92. Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child development , 65 (5), 1318-1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00819.x · DOI
  93. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics , 32 (3), 457-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000154 · DOI
  94. White, T.G., Power, M.A., & White, S. (1989). Morphological analysis: Implications for teaching and understanding vocabulary growth. Reading Research Quarterly , 24 , 283-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/747771 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Coventry University (GB)
Corresponding author
Levesque, Kyle C.
Venue
Journal of Research in Reading
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-29
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
10-26
ISSN
  • 0141-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9817
OpenAlex
W3038338846
Cited by
215
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18
FWCI
31.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Research in Reading (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
morphology (linguistics), morphological skills, morphemes, literacy development, word reading, spelling, reading comprehension, children's literacy, English language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review