Toward a parallel and cascading model of the writing system: A review of research on writing processes coordination
Open accessAbstract
Efficient coordination of the different writing processes is central to producing good-quality texts, and is a fundamental component of writing skill. In this article, I propose a general theoretical framework for considering how writing processes are coordinated, in which writing processes are concurrently activated with more or less overlap between processes depending on their working memory demands, and with the flow of information cascading from central to peripheral levels of processing. To support this view, I review studies that investigated effects of handwriting skills on concurrent activation of higher order processes, and research on word production that explored how information cascades between levels of processing in the writing system. I argue that a parallel and cascading model makes it possible to combine different findings in a common integrated framework and thus constitutes a heuristic for further understanding coordination of the different levels of processing involved in writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill
Alves, R. A., Castro, S. L., & Olive, T. (2008) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590701398951 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
“For example, proficient writers, often considered good regulators, can coordinate their writing processes by transitioning from sequential to more concurrent methods, mitigating the risk of overloading the working memory capacity (Olive 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Olive, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Olive, Thierry
- ORCID
- Olive, Thierry
- Venue
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-194
- ISSN
- 2030-1006 (ISSN-L)
- 2294-3307
- OpenAlex
- W2334551811
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 35.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Writing Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- writing process, levels of processing, working memory load, handwriting skills, word production, writing skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review