The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maximizing Generalized Linear Mixed Model Likelihoods With an Automated Monte Carlo EM Algorithm
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Two new implementations of the EM algorithm are proposed for maximum likelihood fitting of generalized linear mixed models. Both methods use random (independent and identically distributed) sampling to construct Monte Carlo approximations at the E-step. One approach involves generating random samples from the exact conditional distribution of the random effects (given the data) by rejection sampling, using the marginal distribution as a candidate. The second method uses a multivariate t importance sampling approximation. In many applications the two methods are complementary. Rejection sampling is more efficient when sample sizes are small, whereas importance sampling is better with larger sample sizes. Monte Carlo approximation using random samples allows the Monte Carlo error at each iteration to be assessed by using standard central limit theory combined with Taylor series methods. Specifically, we construct a sandwich variance estimate for the maximizer at each approximate E-step. This suggests a rule for automatically increasing the Monte Carlo sample size after iterations in which the true EM step is swamped by Monte Carlo error. In contrast, techniques for assessing Monte Carlo error have not been developed for use with alternative implementations of Monte Carlo EM algorithms utilizing Markov chain Monte Carlo E-step approximations. Three different data sets, including the infamous salamander data of McCullagh and Nelder, are used to illustrate the techniques and to compare them with the alternatives. The results show that the methods proposed can be considerably more efficient than those based on Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. However, the methods proposed may break down when the intractable integrals in the likelihood function are of high dimension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Practical markov chain monte carlo
Geyer, C. J. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011137 · Cited by 2,045
Cited by
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Generalized Linear Mixed Models
McCulloch, C. E. (2001) · Encyclopedia of Environmetrics · doi:10.1002/9780470057339.vag009 · Cited by 295
fLDA: matrix factorization through latent dirichlet allocation
Agarwal, D., & Chen, B.-C. (2010) · Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining · doi:10.1145/1718487.1718499 · Cited by 256
State-space likelihoods for nonlinear fisheries time-series
Valpine, P. D., & Hilborn, R. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f05-116 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, J. G., & Hobert, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-285
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2090692107
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximizing Generalized Linear Mixed Model Likelihoods With an Automated Monte Carlo EM Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9868.00176
- The paper
- Booth, J. G., & Hobert, J. P. (1999). Maximizing Generalized Linear Mixed Model Likelihoods With an Automated Monte Carlo EM Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00176
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.