Cited by 2,045Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Practical markov chain monte carlo

Open access
Geyer, Charles J.·1992·Statistical Science

Abstract

Markov chain Monte Carlo using the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is a general method for the simulation of stochastic processes having probability densities known up to a constant of proportionality. Despite recent advances in its theory, the practice has remained controversial. This article makes the case for basing all inference on one long run of the Markov chain and estimating the Monte Carlo error by standard nonparametric methods well-known in the time-series and operations research literature. In passing it touches on the Kipnis-Varadhan central limit theorem for reversible Markov chains, on some new variance estimators, on judging the relative efficiency of competing Monte Carlo schemes, on methods for constructing more rapidly mixing Markov chains and on diagnostics for Markov chain Monte Carlo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/ss/1177011137

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ScHERVIsH, M. J. and CARLIN, B. P. (1992). On the convergence rate of successive substitution sampling. Journal of Computational Graphical Statist. To appear.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geyer, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Geyer, Charles J.
Venue
Statistical Science
Published
1992-11-01
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
473-483
ISSN
  • 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8745
OpenAlex
W2048971218
Cited by
2,045
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 82
FWCI
24.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistical Science (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
Markov chain Monte Carlo, Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, Monte Carlo error estimation, nonparametric variance estimation, reversible Markov chains, variance estimators, Markov chain mixing, MCMC diagnostics, Bayesian inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review