The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling and Smoothing Parameter Estimation With Multiple Quadratic Penalties
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Penalized likelihood methods provide a range of practical modelling tools, including spline smoothing, generalized additive models and variants of ridge regression. Selecting the correct weights for penalties is a critical part of using these methods and in the single-penalty case the analyst has several well-founded techniques to choose from. However, many modelling problems suggest a formulation employing multiple penalties, and here general methodology is lacking. A wide family of models with multiple penalties can be fitted to data by iterative solution of the generalized ridge regression problem minimize ||W 1/2 (Xp−y) ||2ρ+Σi=1 m θi p′S i p (p is a parameter vector, X a design matrix, S i a non-negative definite coefficient matrix defining the ith penalty with associated smoothing parameter θi, W a diagonal weight matrix, y a vector of data or pseudodata and ρ an ‘overall’ smoothing parameter included for computational efficiency). This paper shows how smoothing parameter selection can be performed efficiently by applying generalized cross-validation to this problem and how this allows non-linear, generalized linear and linear models to be fitted using multiple penalties, substantially increasing the scope of penalized modelling methods. Examples of non-linear modelling, generalized additive modelling and anisotropic smoothing are given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., & Wright, M. H. (2019) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611975604 · Cited by 1,737 · cited 3×
“There are a number of ways of calculating such bands.”
BackgroundInfluentialSome aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin).
Pausas, J. G. (2004) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/b:clim.0000018508.94901.9c · Cited by 798
Model Choice in Time Series Studies of Air Pollution and Mortality
Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., & Louis, T. A. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2006.00410.x · Cited by 583
Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties: results from CALFINE
Ostro, B., Broadwin, R., Green, S., Feng, W.-Y., & Lipsett, M. (2006) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.8335 · Cited by 425
Exposure to particulate air pollution and risk of deep vein thrombosis
Baccarelli, A., Martinelli, I., Zanobetti, A., Grillo, P., Hou, L.-F., Bertazzi, P. A., Mannucci, P. M., & Schwartz, J. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.168.9.920 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Wood, S. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-428
- ISSN
- 1369-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9868
- OpenAlex
- W2116394790
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling and Smoothing Parameter Estimation With Multiple Quadratic Penalties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9868.00240
- The paper
- Wood, S. N. (2000). Modelling and Smoothing Parameter Estimation With Multiple Quadratic Penalties. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.