Cited by 458Healthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Policy and ManagementHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Teaching Hospitals and Quality of Care: A Review of the Literature

Open access
Ayanian, John Z., Weissman, Joel S.·2002·The Milbank Quarterly

Abstract

T eaching hospitals are widely reputed to provide high‐quality care, eliciting very positive public opinions in surveys across the United States (Boscarino 1992). The U.S. News and World Report's listing of “America's Best Hospitals” (2000), based in part on the opinions of academic and community physicians, highly ranks many major teaching hospitals. These public and professional views may reflect features of teaching hospitals that are perceived to foster a higher quality of care, including the treatment of rare diseases and complex patients, the provision of specialized services and advanced technology, and the conduct of biomedical research (Neely and McInturff 1998). Some services, such as specialized surgery and bone marrow transplants, are provided predominantly at teaching hospitals (Levin, Moy, and Griner 2000). Other distinctive missions of teaching hospitals include medical education and training, innovations in clinical care, and treatment of indigent patients, particularly at public teaching hospitals (Blumenthal, Weissman, and Campbell 1997). Because teaching hospitals face increasing pressure to justify their higher charges for clinical care, the quality of care in teaching and nonteaching hospitals is an important policy question. The most rigorous peer‐reviewed studies published between 1985 and 2001 that assessed quality of care by hospital‐teaching status in the United States provide moderately strong evidence of better quality and lower risk‐adjusted mortality in major teaching hospitals for elderly patients with common conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia. A few studies, however, found nursing care, pediatric intensive care, and some surgical outcomes to be better in nonteaching hospitals. Some factors related to teaching status, such as organizational culture, staffing, technology, and volume, may lead to higher‐quality care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0009.00023

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayanian, J. Z., & Weissman, J. S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ayanian, John Z.
Venue
The Milbank Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
569-593
ISSN
  • 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0009
OpenAlex
W2015120039
Cited by
458
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
teaching hospitals, quality of care, hospital teaching status, non-teaching hospitals, risk-adjusted mortality, elderly patients, acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, nursing care, pediatric intensive care, surgical outcomes, hospital volume, organizational culture, hospital staffing, medical education, public teaching hospital, health care costs
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Medical Staff, Hospital, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality of Health Care, United States, Hospital Mortality, Peer Review, Health Care, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review