Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors
Abstract
In this paper we describe a method for testing the null of no cointegration in dynamic panels with multiple regressors and compute approximate critical values for these tests. Methods for non-stationary panels, including panel unit root and panel cointegration tests, have been gaining increased acceptance in recent empirical research. To date, however, tests for the null of no cointegration in heterogeneous panels based on Pedroni (1995, 1997a) have been limited to simple bivariate examples, in large part due to the lack of critical values available for more complex multivariate regressions. The purpose of this paper is to fill this gap by describing a method to implement tests for the null of no cointegration for the case with multiple regressors and to provide appropriate critical values for these cases. The tests allow for considerable heterogeneity among individual members of the panel, including heterogeneity in both the long-run cointegrating vectors as well as heterogeneity in the dynamics associated with short-run deviations from these cointegrating vectors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Investment has a big impact on how fast the economy grows.
“Investment has a big impact on how fast the economy grows [49, 50].”
From Dynamics of economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries: a panel ARDL approach (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Financial Structure and Economic Growth
(2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3001.001.0001 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Salahuddin, M., & Alam, K. (2016) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.005 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
OIL PRICES AND STOCK MARKETS IN GCC COUNTRIES: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM PANEL ANALYSIS
Arouri, M. E. H., & Rault, C. (2012) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.443 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Dhahri, S., & Omri, A. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.008 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Financial inclusion and economic growth linkage: Some cross country evidence
Sethi, D., & Acharya, D. (2018) · Journal of Financial Economic Policy · doi:10.1108/jfep-11-2016-0073 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Ahmed, Z., & Le, H. P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-11205-0 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
ICT, CO <sub>2</sub> Emissions and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Panel of ASEAN
Lee, J. W., & Brahmasrene, T. (2014) · Global Economic Review · doi:10.1080/1226508x.2014.917803 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
ICT and environmental sustainability: Any differences in developing countries?
N’dri, L. M., Islam, M., & Kakinaka, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126642 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Seck, A. (2012) · Structural Change and Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.003 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Does financial development matter for economic growth in the emerging markets?
Nguyen, H. M., Thai-Thuong Le, Q., Ho, C. M., Nguyen, T. C., & Vo, D. H. (2022) · Borsa Istanbul Review · doi:10.1016/j.bir.2021.10.004 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
lin, J., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Hasnaoui, A. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113460 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Financial development and economic growth: global and African evidence
Murinde, V. (2012) · Journal of African Economies · doi:10.1093/jae/ejr042 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Sharma, C., & Sehgal, S. (2010) · Indian Growth and Development Review · doi:10.1108/17538251011084446 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Dynamics of economic growth in ASEAN-5 countries: a panel ARDL approach
Hidthiir, M. H. B., Ahmad, Z., Junoh, M. Z. M., & Yusof, M. F. B. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00351-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
University of Wah., & Mansoor, A. (2022) · University of Wah Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.56220/uwjss2022/0501/10 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pedroni, P.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pedroni, Peter
- ORCID
- Pedroni, Peter
- Venue
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 653-670
- ISSN
- 0305-9049 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0084
- OpenAlex
- W3123833473
- Cited by
- 6,726
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 387 · 2025: 460 · 2024: 492 · 2023: 549 · 2022: 547 · 2021: 457 · 2020: 460 · 2019: 353 · 2018: 290 · 2017: 277 · 2016: 269 · 2015: 266 · 2014: 261 · 2013: 263 · 2012: 197
- FWCI
- 54.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Keywords
- panel cointegration, critical values, heterogeneous panel data, short-run dynamics, panel unit root tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
