The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Three-step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of choosing the number of bootstrap repetitions B for bootstrap standard errors, confidence intervals, confidence regions, hypothesis tests, p-values, and bias correction. For each of these problems, the paper provides a three-step method for choosing B to achieve a desired level of accuracy. Accuracy is measured by the percentage deviation of the bootstrap standard error estimate, confidence interval length, test’s critical value, test’s p-value, or bias-corrected estimate based on B bootstrap simulations from the corresponding ideal bootstrap quantities for which B��. The results apply quite generally to parametric, semiparametric, and nonparametric models with independent and dependent data. The results apply to the standard nonparametric iid bootstrap, moving block bootstraps for time series data, parametric and semiparametric bootstraps, and bootstraps for regression models based on bootstrapping residuals. Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed methods work very well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
Ziegel, E. R., Lehmann, E. L., & Casella, G. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270597 · Cited by 4,203
Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
Efron, B. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410 · Cited by 3,364
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.
(1923) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/33.130.269 · Cited by 3,219
The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations
Kunsch, H. R. (1989) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176347265 · Cited by 2,374
Empirical Processes with Applications to Statistics
Shorack, G. R., & Wellner, J. A. (2009) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719017 · Cited by 2,310
The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion
Hall, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4384-7 · Cited by 2,042
The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion.
Beran, R., & Hall, P. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290736 · Cited by 1,886
Cited by
A Test for Superior Predictive Ability
Hansen, P. R. (2005) · Journal of Business & Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/073500105000000063 · Cited by 1,230
Bootstrapping and PLS-SEM: A step-by-step guide to get more out of your bootstrap results
Streukens, S., & Leroi-Werelds, S. (2016) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.06.003 · Cited by 1,120
Gordon, B. R., Zettelmeyer, F., Bhargava, N., & Chapsky, D. (2019) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2018.1135 · Cited by 287
Estimating Local Fiscal Multipliers
Suárez Serrato, J. C., & Wingender, P. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22425 · Cited by 270
Duguet, E., Leandri, N., L'Horty, Y., & Petit, P. (2010) · Annals of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/41219165 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, D. W. K., & Buchinsky, M.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-51
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W1987005168
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 9.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Three-step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0262.00092
- The paper
- Andrews, D. W. K., & Buchinsky, M. (2000). A Three-step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions. Econometrica. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.