The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Time Series and Cross-Section Asymptotics of Dynamic Panel Data Estimators
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we derive the asymptotic properties of within groups (WG), GMM, and LIML estimators for an autoregressive model with random effects when both T and N tend to infinity. GMM and LIML are consistent and asymptotically equivalent to the WG estimator. When T/N→ 0 the fixed T results for GMM and LIML remain valid, but WG, although consistent, has an asymptotic bias in its asymptotic distribution. When T/N tends to a positive constant, the WG, GMM, and LIML estimators exhibit negative asymptotic biases of order 1/T, 1/N, and 1/(2N−T), respectively. In addition, the crude GMM estimator that neglects the autocorrelation in first differenced errors is inconsistent as T/N→c>0, despite being consistent for fixed T. Finally, we discuss the properties of a random effects pseudo MLE with unrestricted initial conditions when both T and N tend to infinity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Self-citationBiases in dynamic models with fixed effects
Nickell, S. (1981) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911408 · Cited by 8,735
Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-f · Cited by 5,479 · cited 2×
“…to the recent literature on country or regional macropanels (which has focused on models with unit roots, or models with more general forms of heterogeneity as, for example, in Pesaran and Smith, 1995, and Canova and Marcet, 1995), although some of our results may be also relevant in that context.”
ResultEstimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for macroeconomists
Judson, R. A., & Owen, A. L. (1999) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0165-1765(99)00130-5 · Cited by 2,171
Cited by
Panel Data Models With Interactive Fixed Effects
(2009) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta6135 · Cited by 1,690
Dynamic panels with threshold effect and endogeneity
Seo, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2016) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.03.005 · Cited by 698
The weak instrument problem of the system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models
Bun, M. J. G., & Windmeijer, F. (2010) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1368-423x.2009.00299.x · Cited by 498
Model Averaging and Its Use in Economics
Steel, M. F. J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20191385 · Cited by 321
(2016) · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.014 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, J., & Arellano, M.
- Venue
- Econometrica
- Publisher
- The Econometric Society
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1121-1159
- ISSN
- 0012-9682 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0262
- OpenAlex
- W2074046543
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 54.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.