Cited by 160Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Official Crime Statistics: Their use and Interpretation

Open access
MacDonald, Ziggy·2002·The Economic Journal

Abstract

In this paper we consider the data used by economists to estimate economic models of crime. We discuss the main sources of Official Crime Statistics in the United Kingdom, Europe and the United States, and raise questions about the reliability of these data for estimation and forecasting purposes. In particular, we focus on the disparity between crime rates suggested by victimisation surveys and the rates suggested by Official Statistics, and show that this is primarily a consequence of under‐reporting by victims and under‐recording by the police. We conclude our analysis by considering the factors that influence the under‐reporting of crime.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0297.00685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Becker, 1968, ‘Crime and punishment: an economic approach’, Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169, 10.1086/259394 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Burden, 1990, ‘Crime: why don't economists have much to say about it?’, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 3, 209, 10.1177/02601079X9000300304 · DOI
  3. Deadman, 2000, ‘Forecasting residential burglary’
  4. Deadman, 2000, ‘An economic model of criminal activity’
  5. Diez‐Ticio, 2000, ‘Determining factors in the probability of reporting a crime: evidence from Spain’
  6. Entorf, 2000, Socioeconomic and demographic factors of crime in Germany: evidence from panel data of German states’, International Review of Law and Economics, 20, 75, 10.1016/S0144-8188(00)00022-3 · DOI
  7. Goldberg, 1980, ‘Does reporting deter burglars? – an empirical analysis of risk and return in crime’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 62, 424, 10.2307/1927110 · DOI
  8. Hale, 1998, ‘Crime and the business cycle in post‐war Britain revisited’, British Journal of Criminology, 38, 681, 10.1093/bjc/38.4.681 · DOI
  9. Killias, 2000, ‘Crime trends in Europe from 1990 to 1996: how Europe illustrates the limits of the American experience’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 43, 10.1023/A:1008745112022 · DOI
  10. Killias, 2000, ‘The European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics: a new tool in assessing crime and policy issues in comparative and empirical perspective’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 3, 10.1023/A:1008767709296 · DOI
  11. MacDonald, 2000, ‘The impact of under‐reporting on the relationship between unemployment and property crime’, Applied Economics Letters, 7, 659, 10.1080/135048500415978 · DOI
  12. MacDonald, 2001, ‘Revisiting the dark figure: a microeconometric analysis of underreporting of property crime and its implications’, British Journal of Criminology, 41, 127, 10.1093/bjc/41.1.127 · DOI
  13. Machin, 2000, ‘Crime and economic incentives’, 10.1920/wp.ifs.2000.0017 · DOI
  14. Maguire, 1997, ‘Crime statistics, patterns and trends: changing perceptions and their implications’
  15. Myers, 1983, ‘Estimating the economic model of crime: employment versus punishment effects’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 157, 10.2307/1885572 · DOI
  16. Osborn, 2000, ‘An investigation into quarterly crime and its relationship to the economy’
  17. Osborn, 1992, ‘Area characteristics and regional variates as determinants of area property crime levels’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 8, 265, 10.1007/BF01064549 · DOI
  18. Pudney, 2000, ‘The relationship between crime, punishment and economic conditions: is reliable inference possible when crimes are under‐recorded?, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 163, 81, 10.1111/1467-985X.00158 · DOI
  19. Pyle, 1994, ‘Crime and the business cycle in post‐war Britain’, British Journal of Criminology, 34, 339, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048427 · DOI
  20. Scorcu, 1998, ‘Economic activity and crime in the long run: an empirical investigation on aggregate data from Italy, 1951–1994’, International Review of Law and Economics, 18, 279, 10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00011-8 · DOI
  21. Trickett, 1995, ‘Property crime victimisation: the roles of individual and area influences’, International Review of Victimology, 3, 273, 10.1177/026975809500300402 · DOI
  22. Witt, 1999, ‘Crime and economic activity’, British Journal of Criminology, 39, 391, 10.1093/bjc/39.3.391 · DOI
  23. Witte, 1980, ‘Estimating the economic model of crime with individual data’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 57, 10.2307/1884604 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
MacDonald, Z.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Ziggy
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
112
Issue
477
Pages
F85-F106
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W1983292609
Cited by
160
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
official crime statistics, crime rates, crime prediction, data reliability, United Kingdom, Europe, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review