The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Entrepreneurs and the Ordering of Institutional Reform: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine Compared
Abstract
We use survey data to examine new firms in Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine. By measures of job growth, security of property, and market development, our countries fall into two groups: an advanced group including Poland, Romania and Slovakia, with Slovakia falling somewhat behind the other two; and a backward group of Russia and Ukraine. Macroeconomic stability is not sufficient for private‐sector growth. A lack of bank finance does not seem to prevent private‐sector growth. More inhibiting than inadequate finance are insecure property rights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024539 · Cited by 980
Self-citationProbing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions
Meyer, K. E., & Peng, M. W. (2005) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167 · Cited by 845
Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.005 · Cited by 801
Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence
Aparicio, S., Urbano, D., & Audretsch, D. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.006 · Cited by 678
Courts and Relational Contracts
Johnson, S. (2002) · Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/jleo/18.1.221 · Cited by 533
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C.
- Venue
- Economics of Transition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0967-0750 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0351
- OpenAlex
- W2067641198
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 54.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrepreneurs and the Ordering of Institutional Reform: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine Compared. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-0351.00034
- The paper
- Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2000). Entrepreneurs and the Ordering of Institutional Reform: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine Compared. Economics of Transition. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.