Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: market orientation, relationship marketing and resource‐advantage theory

Hunt, Shelby D., Lambe, C. Jay·2000·International Journal of Management Reviews

Abstract

Although overlooked to some degree by non‐marketing disciplines, the discipline of marketing has contributed significantly to the body of knowledge on business strategy over the last two decades. This paper evaluates these contributions, examines how they complement dominant non‐marketing theories of business strategy, and shows how marketing offers a generalized theory of competition that integrates the concepts of both marketing and non‐marketing theories of business strategy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-2370.00029

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J.
Venue
International Journal of Management Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
17-43
ISSN
  • 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2370
OpenAlex
W2136115867
Cited by
365
References
0
FWCI
19.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: market orientation, relationship marketing and resource‐advantage theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-2370.00029
The paper
Hunt, S. D., & Lambe, C. J. (2000). Marketing’s contribution to business strategy: market orientation, relationship marketing and resource‐advantage theory. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.