American hybrid: Donald Trump and the strange merger of populism and plutocracy
Open accessAbstract
Any effort to situate Trump’s ascendance in the broader currents of cross‐national developments, or in the longer course of American political development, must begin by recognizing it as a curious hybrid of populism and plutocracy. Although American right‐wing populism has real social roots, it has long been nurtured by powerful elites seeking to undercut support for modern structures of economic regulation and the welfare state. American political institutions offered a distinctive opportunity for a populist figure to draw on this fury to first capture the nomination of the GOP, and from that position to ascend to the White House. Yet the administration’s substantive agenda constitutes a full‐throated endorsement of the GOP economic elite’s long‐standing demands for cuts in social spending, tax reductions for the wealthy, and the gutting of consumer, worker and environmental protections. The chasm between Trump’s rhetoric and his actions justifies a more skeptical assessment of the breadth and depth of American populism, one that acknowledges how its contours are shaped by the nation's unusual political institutions, its intensifying political polarization and the out‐sized influence of the wealthy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trump had no effect whatsoever on the composition of the country's economic elite.
“Again, Trump had no effect whatsoever on the composition of the country's economic elite (Pierson, 2017), hardly a surprise given the size and diversity of the American economy compared with somewhere like resource-dependent Russia.”
From Post-Populism: Transitions from Populist to Personalist Authoritarian Rule (2023) · cites this paper as Pierson, 2017
In “More plutocrat than populist: Trump in office,” Pierson describes wealthy appointees and continuity in the Republican economic agenda. The abstract says plutocrats’ interests typically prevailed in government. Neither passage addresses whether Trump changed the composition of the country’s economic elite; searches for that claim and for changes in elite membership found no such finding. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Abramowitz, A.I. 2010 The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Achen, C. and Bartels, L. 2016 Democracy for Realists, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Alvaredo, F., Atkinson, A.B., Piketty, T. and Saez, E. 2013 'The Top 1 Percent in Interna- tional and Historical Perspective', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3): 3-20.
- Berry, J.M. and Sobieraj, S. 2013 The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bonica, A., McCarty, N., Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. 2013 'Why Hasn't S118 Paul Pierson V C London School of Economics and Political Science 2017 British Journal of Sociology 68(S1) 14684446, 2017, S1, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-4446.12323, Wiley Online Library on [17/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality?' Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(3): 103-24.
- Cohen, M., Karol, D., Noel, H. and Zaller, J. 2008 The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform, Chi- cago: University of Chicago Press.
- Grossman, M. and Hopkins, D.A. 2016 Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republi- cans and Group Interest Democrats, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hertel-Fernandez, A. and Skocpol, T. 2016 'The Koch Network and Republican Party Extremism', Perspectives on Politics 14(3): 681-99.
- McCarty, N., Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. 2006 Polarized America, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Skocpol, T. and Williamson, V. 2011 The Tea Party and the Remaking of American Conser- vatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post-Populism: Transitions from Populist to Personalist Authoritarian Rule
Balta, E., Baturo, A., & Kenny, P. (2023) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2023-zpppw · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pierson, P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pierson, Paul
- ORCID
- Pierson, Paul
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S105-S119
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4446
- OpenAlex
- W2767704371
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- Donald Trump, populism, plutocracy, right-wing populism, economic elites, Republican Party, political polarization, welfare state, deregulation, political institutions, American political development
- MeSH terms
- Culture, Humans, Politics, Socioeconomic Factors, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review