Cited by 167Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Racial discrimination in Britain, 1969–2017: a meta‐analysis of field experiments on racial discrimination in the British labour market

Open access
Heath, Anthony F., Di Stasio, Valentina·2019·The British Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Field experiments represent the gold standard for determining whether discrimination occurs. Britain has a long and distinguished history of field experiments of racial discrimination in the labour market, with pioneering studies dating back to 1967 and 1969. This article reviews all the published reports of these and subsequent British field experiments of racial discrimination in the labour market, including new results from a 2016/17 field experiment. The article finds enduring contours of racial discrimination in Britain. Firstly, there is an enduring pattern of modest discrimination against white minorities of European heritage in contrast to much greater risks of discrimination faced by the main non‐white groups, suggesting a strong racial component to discrimination. Secondly, while there is some uncertainty about the magnitude of the risks facing applicants with Chinese and Indian names, the black Caribbean, black African and Pakistani groups all face substantial and very similar risks of discrimination. Thirdly, there is no significant diminution in risks of discrimination over time either for Caribbeans or for South Asians as a whole. These results are broadly in line with those from the ethnic penalties literature, suggesting that discrimination is likely to be a major factor explaining the disproportionately and enduringly high unemployment rates of ethnic minorities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-4446.12676

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been little evidence of change in rates of hiring discrimination against minority groups in the United Kingdom over time.

    “Heath & Di Stasio (2019) perform a similar analysis for the United Kingdom and find little evidence of change in rates of hiring discrimination against minority groups over time.”

    From Comparative Perspectives on Racial Discrimination in Hiring: The Rise of Field Experiments (2021) · cites this paper as Heath & Di Stasio (2019)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.Y. and Rothstein, H.R. 2009 Introduction to Meta-Analysis , Chichester: Wiley.
  2. Daniel, W.W. 1968 Racial Discrimination in England , London: Penguin
  3. Esmail, A. and Everington, S 1993 'Racial Discrimination against Doctors from Ethnic Minorities', British Medical Journal 306: 691-2.
  4. Esmail, A. and Everington, S. 1997 'Asian Doctors are Still Being Discriminated against', British Medical Journal 314: 1619.
  5. Firth, M. 1981 'Racial Discrimination in the British Labor Market', Industrial & Labor Relations Review 34: 265-72.
  6. Ford, R. 2008 'Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain?' British Journal of Sociology 59: 609-36.
  7. Gaddis, S.M. (ed.) 2018 Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance , Springer.
  8. Khattab, N. and Modood, T. 2015 'Both Ethnic and Religious: Explaining Employment Penalties across 14 Ethno-religious Groups in the United Kingdom', Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54: 501-22.
  9. Midtbøen, A.H. 2014 'The Invisible Second Generation? Statistical Discrimination and Immigrant Stereotypes in Employment Processes in Norway', Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40: 1657-75.
  10. National Research Council 2004 Measuring Racial Discrimination . Panel on Methods for Assessing Discrimination. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  11. Noon, M. 1993 'Racial Discrimination in Speculative Application: Evidence from the UK's Top 100 Firms', Human Resource Management Journal 3: 35-47
  12. Pager, D. and Karafin, D. 2009 'Bayesian Bigot? Statistical Discrimination, Stereotypes, and Employer Decision Making', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 621:70-93
  13. Pettigrew, T.W. and Meertens, R.W. 1995 'Subtle and Blatant Prejudice in Western Europe', European Journal of Social Psychology 25: 57-75.
  14. Ross, S.L. 2017 'Measuring Trends in Discrimination with Field Experiment Data', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 10815-7.
  15. Storm, I., Sobolewska, M. and Ford, R. 2017 'Is Ethnic Prejudice Declining in Britain? Change in Social Distance Attitudes among Ethnic Majority and Minority Britons', British Journal of Sociology 68: 410-34.
  16. Zschirnt, E. and Ruedin, D . 2016 'Ethnic Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: a Meta-analysis of Correspondence Tests 1990-2015', Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42: 1115-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heath, A. F., & Di Stasio, V.
Affiliations
  • Nuffield Foundation (GB)
  • ERCOMER Utrecht University
Corresponding author
Heath, Anthony F.
Venue
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-06-06
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1774-1798
ISSN
  • 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4446
OpenAlex
W2951065534
Cited by
167
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (649255)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
racial discrimination, employment discrimination, field experiments, ethnic minorities, ethnic penalty, UK labour market
MeSH terms
Employment, Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Unemployment, Black People, White People, Asian People, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review