The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations
Abstract
The goal of this article is attempting to establish a research tradition of Chinese relationalism on the methodological grounds of constructive realism. Two of Ho’s (1993, 1998a) key concepts, person‐in‐relations and persons‐in‐relation, are carefully examined and reinterpreted. Three of my theoretical models, namely, my Face and Favor model (Hwang, 1987), Confucian ethics for ordinary people (Hwang, 1995), and a conflict resolution model (Hwang, 1997‐8), are conceived of as microworlds for illustrating an account of person‐in relations in Chinese culture. The manifestation of Confucian ethics for ordinary people in one’s lifeworld results in the phenomenology of persons‐in‐relations as depicted by Fei’s (1948) differential order or Hsu’s (1971a) psychosociogram. Applying constructive realism to my models and using the result as a framework for studying Chinese social behavior constitutes Chinese relationalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010
The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
Fiske, A. P. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.4.689 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders: Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance
Chen, X.-P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T.-J., Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311410604 · Cited by 555
Servant leadership, trust, and the organizational commitment of public sector employees in China
MIAO, Q., NEWMAN, A., SCHWARZ, G., & XU, L. (2014) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12091 · Cited by 225
Miao, Q., Newman, A., & Huang, X. (2014) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.934890 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, K.
- Venue
- Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-178
- ISSN
- 0021-8308 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5914
- OpenAlex
- W2098808545
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-5914.00124
- The paper
- Hwang, K. (2000). Chinese Relationalism: Theoretical Construction and Methodological Considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.