The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects
Abstract
Recent papers which have examined unit trusts have controlled either for a ‘fund size effect’ or for the ‘small firms effect’ in the investment portfolio. The contribution of this paper is an analysis of the ‘small firms effect’ whilst simultaneously controlling for the ‘fund size effect’. We show that the ethical unit trusts have significantly greater exposure than general unit trusts to the ‘small firms effect’, and that net of this there is no significant evidence of over or under performance by ethical trusts using an adjusted Jensen measure. Using two cross‐sectional approaches, we demonstrate that whilst a ‘small firms effect’ has a role to play in explaining unit trust performance, fund size is not correlated with the financial performance of unit trusts. This cross‐sectional analysis also provides some evidence that ethical unit trusts may perform less well than general unit trusts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716 · Cited by 965
Responsible or Thematic? The True Nature of Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds
Ielasi, F., & Rossolini, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123304 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Luther, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Finance & Accounting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 705-725
- ISSN
- 0306-686X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5957
- OpenAlex
- W2006811132
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.