Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective

Zhao, Wenqing, Rachwalski, Anna, Berndt‐Goke, Maranda, Jin, Yan·2025·Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

Abstract

The growing demand for using AI in day‐to‐day work in the communication industry brings ethical threats to organisations (i.e., misinformation, discrimination and bias, lack of transparency and disclosure, privacy violation and infringement, and copyright infringement). Meanwhile, organisational communication management also faces threats posed by external AI‐driven disinformation. The internal and external threats boost the urgency of strategy development for effective organisational crisis management. This study, based on an online survey of communication professionals in the US ( N = 407), provides timely input to organisations on how to manage AI‐related ethical threats from inside and outside by understanding the perspective of communication practitioners. Building upon extant ethical AI challenges and the theoretical framework of the problem of many hands, this study examines communication professionals' attitudes and perceptions toward both AI ethical threats and strategies proposed to manage those threats, and the predictors of their behavioural intentions regarding threat management. We found that communication practitioners have reservations about being fully transparent about AI use to their clients. To effectively address AI ethical threats, organisations need to consider building a culture of active responsibility to prevent responsibility evasion and impunity, enhancing communication practitioners' awareness and knowledge about the pitfalls of technical systems, and improving practitioners' perceived efficacy of strategies for managing AI ethical threats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-5973.70031

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Abrams Z., 2024, Addressing Equity and Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, Monitor on Psychology, 55, 24
  2. Ardila M. M.2020.The Rise of Intelligent Machines: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Public Relations Industry[Master's Thesis USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism].https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Manuelita-Maldonado_Publishable-Masters-Thesis_110220.pdf.
  3. 10.1177/0266382123118799 · doi:10.1177/0266382123118799
  4. 10.1007/s43681-022-00135-x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102105 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/dap.2021.20 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101656 · DOI
  8. Cartwright B., 2019, Deploying Artificial Intelligence to Combat Disinformation Warfare: Identifying and Interdicting Disinformation Attacks Against Cloud‐Based Social Media Platforms, International Journal on Advances in Security, 12, 203
  9. 10.4324/9780429330650-5 · doi:10.4324/9780429330650-5
  10. Doorn N., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands
  11. 10.3389/frai.2022.826737 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fahlquist J. N., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands
  14. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.008 · DOI
  15. Hinnefeld J. H. P.Cooman N.Mammo andR.Deese2018. Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Bias (arXiv:1809.09245). arXiv.http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09245. · arXiv
  16. 10.1089/cyber.2020.0149 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101907 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/10627260701331762 · doi:10.1080/10627260701331762
  19. 10.1111/1468-5973.12546 · DOI
  20. 10.1108/JCOM-09-2022-0113 · DOI
  21. Kerry C. F., 2020, Protecting Privacy in an AI‐Driven World
  22. 10.1145/3530019.3531329 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1126/science.aao2998 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713842 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0973258619866585 · DOI
  26. Pant A. R.Hoda S. V.Spiegler C.Tantithamthavorn andB.Turhan2023.Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challenges(arXiv:2307.10057). arXiv.http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10057. · arXiv
  27. 10.1080/08900523.2010.497405 · DOI
  28. 10.4324/9781315734217 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/107769900308000212 · doi:10.1177/107769900308000212
  31. 10.1007/s10551-010-0670-3 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1007/bf00881442 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/2046147X15614686 · doi:10.1177/2046147x15614686
  35. 10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9_4 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101868 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0275074014524013 · DOI
  38. 10.1017/9780511844317.003 · DOI
  39. 10.17829/turcom.1050491 · DOI
  40. Vakkuri V. andK. K.Kemell.2019. Implementing AI Ethics in Practice: An Empirical Evaluation of the RESOLVEDD strategy. InSoftware Business: 10th International Conference ICSOB 2019 Jyväskylä Finland November 18–20 2019 Proceedings 10(pp. 260–275). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1. · DOI
  41. 10.1177/00936502231191832 · DOI
  42. Zwart S. D., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, W., Rachwalski, A., Berndt‐Goke, M., & Jin, Y.
Affiliations
  • Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
  • Arthur J. Bauernfeind College of Business Murray State University Murray Kentucky USA
Venue
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-02-11
Volume
33
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0966-0879
  • 1468-5973
Cited by
7
References
15
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-5973.70031
The paper
Zhao, W., Rachwalski, A., Berndt‐Goke, M., & Jin, Y. (2025). An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.