The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective
Abstract
The growing demand for using AI in day‐to‐day work in the communication industry brings ethical threats to organisations (i.e., misinformation, discrimination and bias, lack of transparency and disclosure, privacy violation and infringement, and copyright infringement). Meanwhile, organisational communication management also faces threats posed by external AI‐driven disinformation. The internal and external threats boost the urgency of strategy development for effective organisational crisis management. This study, based on an online survey of communication professionals in the US ( N = 407), provides timely input to organisations on how to manage AI‐related ethical threats from inside and outside by understanding the perspective of communication practitioners. Building upon extant ethical AI challenges and the theoretical framework of the problem of many hands, this study examines communication professionals' attitudes and perceptions toward both AI ethical threats and strategies proposed to manage those threats, and the predictors of their behavioural intentions regarding threat management. We found that communication practitioners have reservations about being fully transparent about AI use to their clients. To effectively address AI ethical threats, organisations need to consider building a culture of active responsibility to prevent responsibility evasion and impunity, enhancing communication practitioners' awareness and knowledge about the pitfalls of technical systems, and improving practitioners' perceived efficacy of strategies for managing AI ethical threats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“From a professional standpoint, Zhao et al. (2025) found that communication practitioners widely recognize transparency and disclosure as ethical imperatives.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Crisis Communication: Investigating Source Effects and Matched Crisis Responses on Stakeholder Perceptions (2026) · cites this paper as Zhao et al. 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., et al. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 · Cited by 10,423
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 · Cited by 6,220
Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
Mittelstadt, B. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 · Cited by 1,886
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9 · Cited by 1,806
How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (. (2009) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.002 · Cited by 1,598
Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview
Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3002101 · Cited by 979
Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120903408 · Cited by 978
Ferrara, E. (2023) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci6010003 · Cited by 875
Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands
Thompson, D. F. (1980) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1954312 · Cited by 651
Transparency and explainability of AI systems: From ethical guidelines to requirements
Balasubramaniam, N., Kauppinen, M., Rannisto, A., Hiekkanen, K., & Kujala, S. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107197 · Cited by 522
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Abrams Z., 2024, Addressing Equity and Ethics in Artificial Intelligence, Monitor on Psychology, 55, 24
- Ardila M. M.2020.The Rise of Intelligent Machines: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming the Public Relations Industry[Master's Thesis USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism].https://instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Manuelita-Maldonado_Publishable-Masters-Thesis_110220.pdf.
- 10.1177/0266382123118799 · doi:10.1177/0266382123118799
- 10.1007/s43681-022-00135-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102105 · DOI
- 10.1017/dap.2021.20 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101656 · DOI
- Cartwright B., 2019, Deploying Artificial Intelligence to Combat Disinformation Warfare: Identifying and Interdicting Disinformation Attacks Against Cloud‐Based Social Media Platforms, International Journal on Advances in Security, 12, 203
- 10.4324/9780429330650-5 · doi:10.4324/9780429330650-5
- Doorn N., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands
- 10.3389/frai.2022.826737 · DOI
- 10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Fahlquist J. N., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.008 · DOI
- Hinnefeld J. H. P.Cooman N.Mammo andR.Deese2018. Evaluating Fairness Metrics in the Presence of Dataset Bias (arXiv:1809.09245). arXiv.http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09245. · arXiv
- 10.1089/cyber.2020.0149 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101907 · DOI
- 10.1080/10627260701331762 · doi:10.1080/10627260701331762
- 10.1111/1468-5973.12546 · DOI
- 10.1108/JCOM-09-2022-0113 · DOI
- Kerry C. F., 2020, Protecting Privacy in an AI‐Driven World
- 10.1145/3530019.3531329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aao2998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713842 · DOI
- 10.1177/0973258619866585 · DOI
- Pant A. R.Hoda S. V.Spiegler C.Tantithamthavorn andB.Turhan2023.Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challenges(arXiv:2307.10057). arXiv.http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10057. · arXiv
- 10.1080/08900523.2010.497405 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315734217 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/107769900308000212 · doi:10.1177/107769900308000212
- 10.1007/s10551-010-0670-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102551 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/bf00881442 · DOI
- 10.1177/2046147X15614686 · doi:10.1177/2046147x15614686
- 10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101868 · DOI
- 10.1177/0275074014524013 · DOI
- 10.1017/9780511844317.003 · DOI
- 10.17829/turcom.1050491 · DOI
- Vakkuri V. andK. K.Kemell.2019. Implementing AI Ethics in Practice: An Empirical Evaluation of the RESOLVEDD strategy. InSoftware Business: 10th International Conference ICSOB 2019 Jyväskylä Finland November 18–20 2019 Proceedings 10(pp. 260–275). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33742-1. · DOI
- 10.1177/00936502231191832 · DOI
- Zwart S. D., 2015, Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Many Hands
Cited by
Schneider, E., Kyriakopoulos, V., Seo, Y., Hong, N., Lee, M., & Lim, J. S. (2026) · Corporate Reputation Review · doi:10.1057/s41299-026-00254-9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Rachwalski, A., Berndt‐Goke, M., & Jin, Y.
- Affiliations
- Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
- Arthur J. Bauernfeind College of Business Murray State University Murray Kentucky USA
- Venue
- Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-02-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0966-0879
- 1468-5973
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 15
- Language
- en
- Licence
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1468-5973.70031
- The paper
- Zhao, W., Rachwalski, A., Berndt‐Goke, M., & Jin, Y. (2025). An Examination of Management of AI‐Triggered Organisational Threats From Communication Practitioners' Perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.