Cited by 10Digital Economy and Work TransformationLegal and Labor StudiesEmotional Labor in Professions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corporeal moderation: digital labour as affective good

Jereza, Rae·2021·Social Anthropology

Abstract

Digital labour scholars have produced insightful analyses of the unpaid, creative, affective labour performed by users on social media platforms. Meanwhile, an increasing number of scholars have been studying the hidden labour of content moderators: underpaid, contingent workers who enable the sanitised online spaces that users take for granted by removing disturbing content. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with third-party Facebook content moderators in the USA and Ireland, I argue that the case of content moderation affords us a new way of putting these approaches into conversation with one another. Specifically, I illustrate how content moderators perform affective labour – for themselves and for the platform – in ways that make possible the monetisation of users’ cultural activities. In doing so, I draw attention to the human costs of maintaining user ‘safety’ and thus the profitability of large social media platforms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-8676.13106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1177/1329878X16665177 · DOI
  2. Anderson B., 2011, Taking‐place: non‐representational theories and geography
  3. 10.1177/1527476407307241 · DOI
  4. 10.1215/9780822375715 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/14680777.2016.1138609 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.8 · DOI
  7. Broek D., 2002, Monitoring and surveillance in call centers: some responses from Australian workers, Labor & Industry, 12
  8. Carmi E., 2019, The hidden listeners: regulating the line from telephone operators to content moderators, International Journal of Communication, 13, 440
  9. Dalla Costa M., 1972, The power of women and the subversion of the community
  10. Federici S., 2012, Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle
  11. 10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.6 · DOI
  12. Gillespie T., 2018, Custodians of the internet: platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media
  13. Gray M., 2019, Ghost work: how to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass
  14. Hardt M., 2000, Empire
  15. Hochschild A., 1983, The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling
  16. Huws U., 2014, Labor in the global digital economy: the cybertariat comes of age
  17. 10.1177/1527476413487607 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1111/hypa.12008 · DOI
  19. Maly I., 2019, New right metapolitics and the algorithmic activism of Schild & Vrienden, Social Media + Society, 1
  20. 10.7591/cornell/9780801450648.001.0001 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1469540513509641 · DOI
  22. Roberts S. T., 2016, Digital refuse: Canadian garbage, commercial content moderation and the global circulation of social media’s waste, Media Studies Publications, 14
  23. Ross A., 2013, Digital labor: the internet as playground and factory, 13
  24. 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095843 · DOI
  25. Salonga A. O., 2019, Enactments of nationhood in transnational call centres, 121
  26. Scholz T., 2013, Digital labor: the internet as playground and factory
  27. Zuboff S., 2018, The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The psychological impacts of content moderation on content moderators: A qualitative study

    Spence, R., Bifulco, A., Bradbury, P., Martellozzo, E., & DeMarco, J. (2023) · Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2023-4-8 · Cited by 48

    “…the business model of many online platforms (Barrett, 2020) moderators remain an undervalued, often hidden profession (Gillespie, 2018), frequently located in the global south and commonly not afforded the same benefits and provisions as offered to other professionals (Roberts, 2019; Jereza, 2021).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Jereza, R.
Affiliations
New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Jereza, Rae
Venue
Social Anthropology
Published
2021-11
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
928-943
ISSN
  • 0964-0282 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8676
OpenAlex
W3212787638
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
Keywords
content moderation, affective labor, digital labor, Facebook, social networking sites, user safety, embodiment, platform capitalism, hidden work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review